Switch to the new iptb #5521
Comments
|
@ipfs/go-team who wants this? It's not exactly a glorious task but we need to get it done. |
|
commenting to follow this issue, as i'll be doing similar stuff for libp2p |
|
@travisperson I know you're busy, but could you make this happen? We have to cut an off-master point release of iptb every time we release because we're stuck on 1.0. |
|
@Stebalien Ya I can update this. I have a branch that has most of the sharness tests updated already from a while back. Let me rebase it, update anything new and I'll open a PR. |
|
Awesome! Doesn't that depend on ipfs/iptb#91? |
|
Yes. Down the road I want to move the plugins out of the main iptb project. At the moment thought that is a bit difficult due to packages conflicting due to gx. That should be fixed this quarter though so for now they will stay there. |
Related to #5521 License: MIT Signed-off-by: Travis Person <[email protected]>
Related to #5521 License: MIT Signed-off-by: Travis Person <[email protected]>
|
Fixed in #5636 |
ghost
removed
the
We have a new iptb version with a changed API. Somebody needs to go through and update all invocations of
iptbin our test cases to use this new API.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: