Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

careful coordination with #326 on ipfs2 -> ipfs command transition #353

Closed
btc opened this issue Nov 16, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

careful coordination with #326 on ipfs2 -> ipfs command transition #353

btc opened this issue Nov 16, 2014 · 3 comments
Milestone
migrate to new co...

Comments

@btc
Copy link
Contributor

btc commented Nov 16, 2014

When we finally replace ipfs and commands with ipfs2 and commands, let's make sure there aren't any large PRs that might encounter rebase challenges. #326 is one such PR.
@btc btc added this to the migrate to new command framework milestone Nov 16, 2014
@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Nov 16, 2014

@maybebtc what do you recommend, land the migration first, or #326? (i guess depends on which one is ready first...)

@btc
Copy link
Contributor Author

btc commented Nov 16, 2014

#326 will be ready before multipart and mount

@jbenet jbenet changed the title careful coordination careful coordination with #326 on ipfs2 -> ipfs command transition Nov 16, 2014
@btc
Copy link
Contributor Author

btc commented Nov 16, 2014

done.

@btc btc closed this as completed Nov 16, 2014
ariescodescream pushed a commit to ariescodescream/go-ipfs that referenced this issue Oct 23, 2021
@Stebalien
Merge pull request ipfs#353 from libp2p/feat/message-size
874e3d3 
Feat/message size
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
migrate to new command framework
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jbenet @btc