Skip to content

Conversation

@Thoralf-M
Copy link
Member

Fixes #121

@Thoralf-M
Copy link
Member Author

Will rebase after #125 is merged

@Thoralf-M Thoralf-M reopened this Aug 19, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@DaughterOfMars DaughterOfMars left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I still think we should use imports to shorten up the long type signatures but 🤷‍♀️

@Thoralf-M
Copy link
Member Author

I still think we should use imports to shorten up the long type signatures but 🤷‍♀️

How would you name the aliases? All with some prefix?

@thibault-martinez
Copy link
Member

I still think we should use imports to shorten up the long type signatures but 🤷‍♀️

How would you name the aliases? All with some prefix?

I don't think she meant having aliases

@DaughterOfMars
Copy link
Contributor

I still think we should use imports to shorten up the long type signatures but 🤷‍♀️

How would you name the aliases? All with some prefix?

I don't think she meant having aliases

Yeah, I just meant importing the inner types inside the fns

@Thoralf-M
Copy link
Member Author

@DaughterOfMars did you want it like this? Not sure if I prefer that

@thibault-martinez
Copy link
Member

conflicts

@thibault-martinez thibault-martinez merged commit 626cce8 into sdk-bindings Aug 21, 2025
7 checks passed
@thibault-martinez thibault-martinez deleted the ffi/secp256r1 branch August 21, 2025 12:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

FFI for the Secp256r1PrivateKey, Secp256r1VerifyingKey and Secp256r1Verifier types

4 participants