WebAccess: minor ommission in a doc example (regarding groups and fireroles) may produce an exception #3107
Comments
jirikuncar
changed the title
kaplun
added a commit
to kaplun/invenio
that referenced
this issue
Jun 4, 2015
* FIX Improves the WebAccess FireRole documentation by providing corrected example on how to use groups in FireRole definitions. (closes inveniosoftware#3107) Signed-off-by: Samuele Kaplun <[email protected]> Reported-by: Theodoros Theodoropoulos <[email protected]>
tiborsimko
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 24, 2016
* FIX Improves the WebAccess FireRole documentation by providing corrected example on how to use groups in FireRole definitions. (closes #3107) (closes #3225) Signed-off-by: Samuele Kaplun <[email protected]> Reported-by: Theodoros Theodoropoulos <[email protected]>
|
Thanks, merged as e7ba096. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It seems that if one follows the example in the WebAccess docs, and tries to enter:
deny group badguysin a firerole, an exception is thrown.
By reading the code, I found out that the solution is VERY simple: I just have to put single or double quotes in the groupname to make it work! So,
deny group 'badguys'is OK and produces no exceptions.
The requirement to have expressions included in quotes is very reasonable, so my proposal is to simply change the example(s) in the docs, according to this requirement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: