Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 12 commits
Commits
Show all changes
24 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
e139505
WIP
AlexeySachkov Nov 3, 2022
981c726
Refactor sycl-post-link part
AlexeySachkov Nov 3, 2022
03a4db5
Refactor/generalize some code
AlexeySachkov Nov 4, 2022
f7de004
Renaming; better names for split modules
AlexeySachkov Nov 4, 2022
cc01839
Move device code split tests into a separate directory
AlexeySachkov Nov 4, 2022
f266933
Fix DenseMap helpers
AlexeySachkov Nov 4, 2022
eca5ca4
Fix cross module device globals detection
AlexeySachkov Nov 4, 2022
731f6f7
revert changes in device_requirments test
AlexeySachkov Nov 4, 2022
df73f90
Add a couple of LIT tests
AlexeySachkov Nov 7, 2022
18ba12c
KernelProperties -> UsedOptionalFeatures
AlexeySachkov Nov 11, 2022
7d7fd45
Cache UsedOptionalFeatures hash
AlexeySachkov Nov 11, 2022
bd2ae95
Aspects order shouldn't matter
AlexeySachkov Nov 11, 2022
b706a70
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/sycl' into private/asachkov/per-…
AlexeySachkov Nov 11, 2022
496ee74
More renamings
AlexeySachkov Nov 11, 2022
c3b975d
Make test more strict
AlexeySachkov Nov 15, 2022
2331196
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/sycl' into private/asachkov/per-…
AlexeySachkov Nov 15, 2022
8cac6b8
Apply clang-format
AlexeySachkov Nov 15, 2022
4be7927
Refactor tests a bit
AlexeySachkov Nov 16, 2022
01c88f4
Add test for SYCL_EXTERNAL functions
AlexeySachkov Nov 16, 2022
7272fee
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/sycl' into private/asachkov/per-…
AlexeySachkov Nov 16, 2022
12e2622
Do not always perform per-aspect split
AlexeySachkov Nov 17, 2022
b39798b
Apply review comments
AlexeySachkov Nov 17, 2022
0cc45b2
Apply comments
AlexeySachkov Nov 21, 2022
61ec5e9
Apply comments
AlexeySachkov Nov 21, 2022
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
; This test emulates two translation units with 3 kernels:
; TU0_kernel0 - 1st translation unit, no aspects used
; TU0_kernel1 - 1st translation unit, aspect 1 is used
; TU1_kernel2 - 2nd translation unit, no aspects used

; The test is intended to check that sycl-post-link correctly separates kernels
; that use aspects from kernels which doesn't use aspects regardless of device
; code split mode

; RUN: sycl-post-link -split=auto -symbols -S %s -o %t.table
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_0.ll --check-prefixes CHECK-M0-IR \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_1.ll --check-prefixes CHECK-M1-IR \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_2.ll --check-prefixes CHECK-M2-IR \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_0.sym --check-prefixes CHECK-M0-SYMS \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_1.sym --check-prefixes CHECK-M1-SYMS \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_2.sym --check-prefixes CHECK-M2-SYMS \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1

; RUN: sycl-post-link -split=source -symbols -S %s -o %t.table
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_0.ll --check-prefixes CHECK-M0-IR \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_1.ll --check-prefixes CHECK-M1-IR \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_2.ll --check-prefixes CHECK-M2-IR \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_0.sym --check-prefixes CHECK-M0-SYMS \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_1.sym --check-prefixes CHECK-M1-SYMS \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_2.sym --check-prefixes CHECK-M2-SYMS \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1

; RUN: sycl-post-link -split=kernel -symbols -S %s -o %t.table
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_0.ll --check-prefixes CHECK-M0-IR \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_1.ll --check-prefixes CHECK-M1-IR \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_2.ll --check-prefixes CHECK-M2-IR \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_0.sym --check-prefixes CHECK-M0-SYMS \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_1.sym --check-prefixes CHECK-M1-SYMS \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_2.sym --check-prefixes CHECK-M2-SYMS \
; RUN: --implicit-check-not kernel0 --implicit-check-not kernel1

; Regardless of device code split mode, each kernel should go into a separate
; device image

; CHECK-M2-IR: define {{.*}} @TU0_kernel0
; CHECK-M2-SYMS: TU0_kernel0

; CHECK-M1-IR: define {{.*}} @TU0_kernel1
; CHECK-M1-SYMS: TU0_kernel1

; CHECK-M0-IR: define {{.*}} @TU1_kernel2
; CHECK-M0-SYMS: TU1_kernel2

target datalayout = "e-i64:64-v16:16-v24:32-v32:32-v48:64-v96:128-v192:256-v256:256-v512:512-v1024:1024"
target triple = "spir64-unknown-linux"

; FIXME: device globals should also be properly distributed across device images
; if they are of optional type
@_ZL2GV = internal addrspace(1) constant [1 x i32] [i32 42], align 4

define dso_local spir_kernel void @TU0_kernel0() #0 {
entry:
call spir_func void @foo()
ret void
}

define dso_local spir_func void @foo() {
entry:
%a = alloca i32, align 4
%call = call spir_func i32 @bar(i32 1)
%add = add nsw i32 2, %call
store i32 %add, i32* %a, align 4
ret void
}

; Function Attrs: nounwind
define linkonce_odr dso_local spir_func i32 @bar(i32 %arg) {
entry:
%arg.addr = alloca i32, align 4
store i32 %arg, i32* %arg.addr, align 4
%0 = load i32, i32* %arg.addr, align 4
ret i32 %0
}

define dso_local spir_kernel void @TU0_kernel1() #0 !sycl_used_aspects !2 {
entry:
call spir_func void @foo1()
ret void
}

; Function Attrs: nounwind
define dso_local spir_func void @foo1() {
entry:
%a = alloca i32, align 4
store i32 2, i32* %a, align 4
ret void
}

define dso_local spir_kernel void @TU1_kernel2() #1 {
Comment thread
AlexeySachkov marked this conversation as resolved.
entry:
call spir_func void @foo2()
ret void
}

; Function Attrs: nounwind
define dso_local spir_func void @foo2() {
entry:
%a = alloca i32, align 4
%0 = load i32, i32 addrspace(4)* getelementptr inbounds ([1 x i32], [1 x i32] addrspace(4)* addrspacecast ([1 x i32] addrspace(1)* @_ZL2GV to [1 x i32] addrspace(4)*), i64 0, i64 0), align 4
%add = add nsw i32 4, %0
store i32 %add, i32* %a, align 4
ret void
}

attributes #0 = { "sycl-module-id"="TU1.cpp" }
attributes #1 = { "sycl-module-id"="TU2.cpp" }

!opencl.spir.version = !{!0, !0}
!spirv.Source = !{!1, !1}

!0 = !{i32 1, i32 2}
!1 = !{i32 4, i32 100000}
!2 = !{i32 1}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
; The test is intended to check that sycl-post-link correctly groups kernels
; by unique sets of aspects used in them

; RUN: sycl-post-link -split=auto -symbols -S %s -o %t.table
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t.table --check-prefix CHECK-TABLE
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_0.sym --check-prefix CHECK-M0-SYMS
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_1.sym --check-prefix CHECK-M1-SYMS
; RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t_2.sym --check-prefix CHECK-M2-SYMS

; FIXME: We expect to see exactly three modules
; CHECK-TABLE: Code
; CHECK-TABLE-NEXT: _0.sym
; CHECK-TABLE-NEXT: _1.sym
; CHECK-TABLE-NEXT: _2.sym
; CHECK-TABLE-EMPTY:

; CHECK-M0-SYMS: kernel3
; CHECK-M0-SYMS-EMPTY:

; CHECK-M1-SYMS: kernel0
; CHECK-M1-SYMS-EMPTY:

; CHECK-M2-SYMS: kernel1
; CHECK-M2-SYMS: kernel2
; CHECK-M2-SYMS-EMPTY:

target datalayout = "e-i64:64-v16:16-v24:32-v32:32-v48:64-v96:128-v192:256-v256:256-v512:512-v1024:1024"
target triple = "spir64-unknown-linux"

define dso_local spir_kernel void @kernel0() #0 !sycl_used_aspects !1 {
entry:
ret void
}

define dso_local spir_kernel void @kernel1() #0 !sycl_used_aspects !2 {
entry:
ret void
}

define dso_local spir_kernel void @kernel2() #0 !sycl_used_aspects !3 {
entry:
ret void
}

define dso_local spir_kernel void @kernel3() #0 !sycl_used_aspects !4 {
entry:
ret void
}

attributes #0 = { "sycl-module-id"="TU1.cpp" }

!1 = !{i32 1}
!2 = !{i32 1, i32 2}
!3 = !{i32 2, i32 1}
!4 = !{i32 2, i32 3, i32 4}
141 changes: 141 additions & 0 deletions llvm/tools/sycl-post-link/ModuleSplitter.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -761,5 +761,146 @@ getDoubleGRFSplitter(ModuleDesc &&MD, bool EmitOnlyKernelsAsEntryPoints) {
return std::make_unique<ModuleCopier>(std::move(MD), std::move(Groups));
}

namespace {
// Data structure, which represent a combination of all possible optional
// features used in a function.
//
// It has extra methods to be useable as a key in llvm::DenseMap.
struct UsedOptionalFeatures {
SmallVector<int, 4> Aspects;
// TODO: extend this further with reqd-sub-group-size, reqd-work-group-size,
// double-grf and other properties

UsedOptionalFeatures() = default;

UsedOptionalFeatures(const Function *F) {
if (const MDNode *MDN = F->getMetadata("sycl_used_aspects")) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought @steffenlarsen made some changes to sycl-post-link splitting for his work, but I don't see it in this history for this file. Is this intended to implement the stuff he's doing too in the future besides sycl_used_aspects?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What @steffenlarsen implemented is support for sycl_ext_oneapi_kernel_properties extension. At the moment, it simply provides an alternative interface for 4 core SYCL attributes (reqd_sub_group_size, reqd_work_group_size, work_group_size_hint?, device_has). Under the hood, we use the same LLVM IR representation for both attributes and properties (but the alignment might happen at different stages/in different places for different attributes/property pairs).

So, the idea is that this code will handle both in assumption that unification has happened prior it. When introducing new properties or attributes, I suppose that each will be designed case-by-case, but we should aim to have a similar handling flow for all of them.

For example, this new splitter I'm adding is also supposed to split modules by their reqd_sub_group_size, for example, but I will add that in a separate PR not to overcomplicate this one and have some baseline/infrastructure ready first

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good, thanks

auto ExtractIntegerFromMDNodeOperand = [=](const MDNode *N,
unsigned OpNo) -> auto {
Constant *C =
cast<ConstantAsMetadata>(N->getOperand(OpNo).get())->getValue();
return C->getUniqueInteger().getSExtValue();
};

for (size_t I = 0, E = MDN->getNumOperands(); I < E; ++I) {
Aspects.push_back(ExtractIntegerFromMDNodeOperand(MDN, I));
Comment thread
AlexeySachkov marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
}
llvm::sort(Aspects);
}

llvm::hash_code AspectsHash =
llvm::hash_combine_range(Aspects.begin(), Aspects.end());
Hash = static_cast<unsigned>(llvm::hash_combine(AspectsHash));
}

std::string getName(StringRef BaseName) const {
if (Aspects.empty())
return BaseName.str() + "-no-aspects";

std::string Ret = BaseName.str() + "-aspects";
for (int A : Aspects) {
Ret += "-" + std::to_string(A);
}
return Ret;
}

static UsedOptionalFeatures getTombstone() {
UsedOptionalFeatures Ret;
Ret.IsTombstoneKey = true;
return Ret;
}

static UsedOptionalFeatures getEmpty() {
UsedOptionalFeatures Ret;
Ret.IsEmpty = true;
return Ret;
}

private:
// For DenseMap:
llvm::hash_code Hash = {};
bool IsTombstoneKey = false;
bool IsEmpty = false;

public:
bool operator==(const UsedOptionalFeatures &Other) const {
// Tombstone does not compare equal to any other item
if (IsTombstoneKey || Other.IsTombstoneKey)
return false;

if (Aspects.size() != Other.Aspects.size())
return false;

for (size_t I = 0, E = Aspects.size(); I != E; ++I) {
if (Aspects[I] != Other.Aspects[I])
return false;
}

return IsEmpty == Other.IsEmpty;
}

unsigned hash() const {
return static_cast<unsigned>(Hash);
}
};

struct UsedOptionalFeaturesAsKeyInfo {
static inline UsedOptionalFeatures getEmptyKey() {
return UsedOptionalFeatures::getEmpty();
}

static inline UsedOptionalFeatures getTombstoneKey() {
return UsedOptionalFeatures::getTombstone();
}

static unsigned getHashValue(const UsedOptionalFeatures &Value) {
return Value.hash();
}

static bool isEqual(const UsedOptionalFeatures &LHS,
const UsedOptionalFeatures &RHS) {
return LHS == RHS;
}
};
}

std::unique_ptr<ModuleSplitterBase>
getPropertiesBasedSplitter(ModuleDesc &&MD, bool EmitOnlyKernelsAsEntryPoints) {
EntryPointGroupVec Groups;

DenseMap<UsedOptionalFeatures, EntryPointSet, UsedOptionalFeaturesAsKeyInfo>
PropertiesToFunctionsMap;

Module &M = MD.getModule();

// Only process module entry points:
for (auto &F : M.functions()) {
if (!isEntryPoint(F, EmitOnlyKernelsAsEntryPoints) ||
!MD.isEntryPointCandidate(F)) {
Comment on lines +876 to +877

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This "||" is confusing for an uninformed reader (like me). I would have expected to see "&&" instead, based on the methods called.

If the call is correct, can you add clarifying comment to the sources, please?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at isEntryPointCandidate description it seems to me that the description is correct, i.e. we might have an entry point in a module, which actually belongs to a different device image and from that point of view we need to use || here to avoid inclusion of that entry point to more than one module.

However, I don't quite understand how it is possible to get a module that contains entry points which belong to another module. That "entry point candidate" mechanism was introduced in 9a55da5 as a replacement for "allowed entries" introduced by 8c7bb45. Perhaps @kbobrovs can share some background here?

continue;
}

auto Key = UsedOptionalFeatures(&F);
PropertiesToFunctionsMap[Key].insert(&F);
Comment thread
AlexeySachkov marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
}

if (!PropertiesToFunctionsMap.empty()) {
Comment thread
AlexeySachkov marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
Groups.reserve(PropertiesToFunctionsMap.size());
for (auto &EPG : PropertiesToFunctionsMap) {
Groups.emplace_back(EntryPointGroup{
EPG.first.getName(MD.getEntryPointGroup().GroupId),
std::move(EPG.second), MD.getEntryPointGroup().Props});
Comment thread
AlexeySachkov marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
}
} else {
// No entry points met, record this.
Groups.push_back({GLOBAL_SCOPE_NAME, {}});
Comment thread
AlexeySachkov marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
}

if (Groups.size() > 1)
return std::make_unique<ModuleSplitter>(std::move(MD), std::move(Groups));
else
return std::make_unique<ModuleCopier>(std::move(MD), std::move(Groups));
}

} // namespace module_split
} // namespace llvm
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions llvm/tools/sycl-post-link/ModuleSplitter.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -253,6 +253,9 @@ getSplitterByMode(ModuleDesc &&MD, IRSplitMode Mode,
std::unique_ptr<ModuleSplitterBase>
getDoubleGRFSplitter(ModuleDesc &&MD, bool EmitOnlyKernelsAsEntryPoints);

std::unique_ptr<ModuleSplitterBase>
getPropertiesBasedSplitter(ModuleDesc &&MD, bool EmitOnlyKernelsAsEntryPoints);

#ifndef NDEBUG
void dumpEntryPoints(const EntryPointSet &C, const char *msg = "", int Tab = 0);
void dumpEntryPoints(const Module &M, bool OnlyKernelsAreEntryPoints = false,
Expand Down
Loading