Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI][UR] Unify UR and SYCL benchmarking CI into a single benchmarking CI #17229

Draft
wants to merge 58 commits into
base: sycl
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ianayl
Copy link
Contributor

@ianayl ianayl commented Feb 27, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@pbalcer pbalcer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we also probably need to modify CODEOWNERS to include the new team, right?

@ianayl
Copy link
Contributor Author

ianayl commented Mar 3, 2025

we also probably need to modify CODEOWNERS to include the new team, right?

Yeah: Although, I'm thinking we do this at the end, when the workflow has taken more shape and we know exactly what locations to add to CODEOWNERS

@ianayl ianayl temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock March 4, 2025 21:21 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@ianayl ianayl temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock March 4, 2025 21:36 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
pbalcer and others added 19 commits March 5, 2025 16:32
This patch improves numerous aspects on how the benchmarking
results are visualized:
 - rewrites the way HTML charts are generated, using a library (Chart.js)
 that's both easier to use and more visually pleasing.
 The new HTML page also now decouples data from the HTML itself,
 leading to faster load times and the ability to fetch data
 from remote sources.
 - The markdown output now contains a failures section that
 lists all benchmarks that failed for a given run. This will be
 a helpful for developers during PR testing.
 - Benchmarks can now have description that's displayed on the page.
 - And many more minor improvements.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants