Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
riscv: patch: Fixup lockdep warning in stop_machine
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
The task of ftrace_arch_code_modify(_post)_prepare() caller is
stop_machine, whose caller and work thread are of different tasks. The
lockdep checker needs the same task context, or it's wrong. That means
it's a bug here to use lockdep_assert_held because we don't guarantee
the same task context.

kernel/locking/lockdep.c:
int __lock_is_held(const struct lockdep_map *lock, int read)
{
        struct task_struct *curr = current;
        int i;

        for (i = 0; i < curr->lockdep_depth; i++) {
			^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                struct held_lock *hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
					  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                if (match_held_lock(hlock, lock)) {
                        if (read == -1 || !!hlock->read == read)
                                return LOCK_STATE_HELD;

The __lock_is_held depends on current held_locks records; if
stop_machine makes the checker running on another task, that's wrong.

Here is the log:
[   15.761523] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   15.762125] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 15 at arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c:63 patch_insn_write+0x72/0x364
[   15.763258] Modules linked in:
[   15.764154] CPU: 0 PID: 15 Comm: migration/0 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc1-00014-g66924be85884-dirty torvalds#377
[   15.765339] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
[   15.765985] Stopper: multi_cpu_stop+0x0/0x192 <- stop_cpus.constprop.0+0x90/0xe2
[   15.766711] epc : patch_insn_write+0x72/0x364
[   15.767011]  ra : patch_insn_write+0x70/0x364
[   15.767276] epc : ffffffff8000721e ra : ffffffff8000721c sp : ff2000000067bca0
[   15.767622]  gp : ffffffff81603f90 tp : ff60000002432a00 t0 : 7300000000000000
[   15.767919]  t1 : 0000000000000000 t2 : 73695f6b636f6c5f s0 : ff2000000067bcf0
[   15.768238]  s1 : 0000000000000008 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 : 0000000000000000
[   15.768537]  a2 : 0000000000000000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : 0000000000000000
[   15.768837]  a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 : 0000000000000000
[   15.769139]  s2 : ffffffff80009faa s3 : ff2000000067bd10 s4 : ffffffffffffffff
[   15.769447]  s5 : 0000000000000001 s6 : 0000000000000001 s7 : 0000000000000003
[   15.769740]  s8 : 0000000000000002 s9 : 0000000000000004 s10: 0000000000000003
[   15.770027]  s11: 0000000000000002 t3 : 0000000000000000 t4 : ffffffff819af097
[   15.770323]  t5 : ffffffff819af098 t6 : ff2000000067ba28
[   15.770574] status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000003
[   15.771102] [<ffffffff80007520>] patch_text_nosync+0x10/0x3a
[   15.771421] [<ffffffff80009c66>] ftrace_update_ftrace_func+0x74/0x10a
[   15.771704] [<ffffffff800fa17e>] ftrace_modify_all_code+0xb0/0x16c
[   15.771958] [<ffffffff800fa24c>] __ftrace_modify_code+0x12/0x1c
[   15.772196] [<ffffffff800e110e>] multi_cpu_stop+0x14a/0x192
[   15.772454] [<ffffffff800e0a34>] cpu_stopper_thread+0x96/0x14c
[   15.772699] [<ffffffff8003f4ea>] smpboot_thread_fn+0xf8/0x1cc
[   15.772945] [<ffffffff8003ac9c>] kthread+0xe2/0xf8
[   15.773160] [<ffffffff80003e98>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x14
[   15.773471] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

By the way, this also fixes the same issue for patch_text().

Fixes: 0ff7c3b ("riscv: Use text_mutex instead of patch_lock")
Co-developed-by: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
Cc: Zong Li <[email protected]>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
Changbin Du authored and intel-lab-lkp committed Feb 2, 2023
1 parent 9f266cc commit e5dbda8
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 10 additions and 10 deletions.
5 changes: 2 additions & 3 deletions arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -126,9 +126,8 @@ int ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec,
/*
* This is called early on, and isn't wrapped by
* ftrace_arch_code_modify_{prepare,post_process}() and therefor doesn't hold
* text_mutex, which triggers a lockdep failure. SMP isn't running so we could
* just directly poke the text, but it's simpler to just take the lock
* ourselves.
* text_mutex. SMP isn't running so we could just directly poke the text, but
* it's simpler to just take the lock ourselves.
*/
int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
{
Expand Down
15 changes: 8 additions & 7 deletions arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -49,19 +49,20 @@ static void patch_unmap(int fixmap)
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_unmap);

/*
* Before reaching here, it was expected to lock the text_mutex
* already, so we don't need to give another lock here and could
* ensure that it was safe between each cores. We do not add
* lockdep assertion here since it would trigger a false positive
* when called by stop_machine (The lockdep checker requires the
* same task context).
*/
static int patch_insn_write(void *addr, const void *insn, size_t len)
{
void *waddr = addr;
bool across_pages = (((uintptr_t) addr & ~PAGE_MASK) + len) > PAGE_SIZE;
int ret;

/*
* Before reaching here, it was expected to lock the text_mutex
* already, so we don't need to give another lock here and could
* ensure that it was safe between each cores.
*/
lockdep_assert_held(&text_mutex);

if (across_pages)
patch_map(addr + len, FIX_TEXT_POKE1);

Expand Down

0 comments on commit e5dbda8

Please sign in to comment.