Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
bpf: Return -ENOTSUPP if calls are not allowed in non-JITed programs
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
If CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set and bpf_jit_enable is 0, there
exist 6 failed tests.

  [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
  [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled
  [root@linux bpf]# ./test_verifier | grep FAIL
  torvalds#106/p inline simple bpf_loop call FAIL
  torvalds#107/p don't inline bpf_loop call, flags non-zero FAIL
  torvalds#108/p don't inline bpf_loop call, callback non-constant FAIL
  torvalds#109/p bpf_loop_inline and a dead func FAIL
  torvalds#110/p bpf_loop_inline stack locations for loop vars FAIL
  torvalds#111/p inline bpf_loop call in a big program FAIL
  Summary: 768 PASSED, 15 SKIPPED, 6 FAILED

The test log shows that callbacks are not allowed in non-JITed programs,
interpreter doesn't support them yet, thus these tests should be skipped
if jit is disabled, just return -ENOTSUPP instead of -EINVAL for pseudo
calls in fixup_call_args().

With this patch:

  [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
  [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled
  [root@linux bpf]# ./test_verifier | grep FAIL
  Summary: 768 PASSED, 21 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Additionally, as Eduard suggested, return -ENOTSUPP instead of -EINVAL
for the other three places where "non-JITed" is used in error messages
to keep consistent.

Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
Tiezhu Yang authored and intel-lab-lkp committed Jan 4, 2024
1 parent c040e90 commit 46792ea
Showing 1 changed file with 4 additions and 4 deletions.
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions kernel/bpf/verifier.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8908,7 +8908,7 @@ static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
goto error;
if (env->subprog_cnt > 1 && !allow_tail_call_in_subprogs(env)) {
verbose(env, "tail_calls are not allowed in non-JITed programs with bpf-to-bpf calls\n");
return -EINVAL;
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
break;
case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -19069,22 +19069,22 @@ static int fixup_call_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
#ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
if (has_kfunc_call) {
verbose(env, "calling kernel functions are not allowed in non-JITed programs\n");
return -EINVAL;
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
if (env->subprog_cnt > 1 && env->prog->aux->tail_call_reachable) {
/* When JIT fails the progs with bpf2bpf calls and tail_calls
* have to be rejected, since interpreter doesn't support them yet.
*/
verbose(env, "tail_calls are not allowed in non-JITed programs with bpf-to-bpf calls\n");
return -EINVAL;
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++, insn++) {
if (bpf_pseudo_func(insn)) {
/* When JIT fails the progs with callback calls
* have to be rejected, since interpreter doesn't support them yet.
*/
verbose(env, "callbacks are not allowed in non-JITed programs\n");
return -EINVAL;
return -ENOTSUPP;
}

if (!bpf_pseudo_call(insn))
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 46792ea

Please sign in to comment.