- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 49
Support savepoints on AWS S3 #39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
| Codecov Report
 @@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #39      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   52.91%   50.66%   -2.25%     
==========================================
  Files          13       13              
  Lines         567      598      +31     
==========================================
+ Hits          300      303       +3     
- Misses        218      245      +27     
- Partials       49       50       +1
 Continue to review full report at Codecov. 
 | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, you should not commit files under vendor
| I'm happy to remove them, but there are lots of files committed under vendor in master, I assumed you guys were vendoring dependencies? | 
| I am not sure why it happens before either,  is it necessary to add a  If it does, I would like to do it. | 
| Thanks for the contribution @kerinin. We do actually commit the vendor directory. As stated in the dep FAQ (https://github.com/golang/dep/blob/master/docs/FAQ.md#should-i-commit-my-vendor-directory), it does have a con of polluting the PR but it also has some nice advantages. I'll get to reviewing this beginning of next week! | 
| u, err := url.Parse(dir) | ||
|  | ||
| if err == nil && s3Schemes[u.Scheme] { | ||
| return o.retrieveLatestSavepointS3(u) | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There could be multiple jobs running in the same flink cluster. Do you assume the savepoint dir param to this function is unique to each job?
No description provided.