Use type given by quint to build lambda bodies

[bugarela]

Hello

Fixes informalsystems/quint#1393

The issue happened because we were only using the types given by Quint in the type map to annotate parameters, but not the result type of lambdas. This way, there was a mismatch in variable names on Apalache type inference (used for the body) and Quint type inference (used for the parameters).

This PR ensures that we always use Quint types.

• Tests added for any new code
• Ran make fmt-fix (or had formatting run automatically on all files edited)
• Documentation added for any new functionality
• Entries added to ./unreleased/ for any new functionality

[shonfeder]

This PR ensures that we always use Quint types.

Just to be clear: we have always been using quint types, it's just a matter of where we were sourcing those types from.

[shonfeder]

LGTM!

Great work debugging and fixing here! That test is much more readable than what we were looking at before :D

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.90%. Comparing base (811b480) to head (ffc2437).

❗ Current head ffc2437 differs from pull request most recent head 3dac602. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3dac602 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2856      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.89%   78.90%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         467      467              
  Lines       15956    15959       +3     
  Branches     2625     2631       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        12588    12592       +4     
+ Misses       3368     3367       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.