feat: add SchemaProvider::table_type(table_name: &str) (#16401)

[epgif]

This is a backport of

• feat: add SchemaProvider::table_type(table_name: &str) apache/datafusion#16401

• feat: add SchemaProvider::table_type(table_name: &str)

InformationSchemaConfig::make_tables only needs the TableType not the
whole TableProvider, and the former may require an expensive catalog
operation to construct and the latter may not.

This allows avoiding SELECT * FROM information_schema.tables having to
make 1 of those potentially expensive operations per table.

• test: new InformationSchemaConfig::make_tables behavior

• Move tests to same file to fix CI

---

Co-authored-by: Andrew Lamb [email protected]

[alamb]

FYI @crepererum who is in the process of upgrading DataFusion

I think we need to target this PR into a branch other than main (I think to the one in #64) so it is picked up by iinfluxdb_iox

[epgif]

FYI @crepererum who is in the process of upgrading DataFusion

I think we need to target this PR into a branch other than main (I think to the one in #64) so it is picked up by iinfluxdb_iox

Sorry, I'm not familiar with the process. I can target another branch, or someone else can cherry-pick (it's clean) if that's easier.

[alamb]

No worries -- let's wait for @crepererum to respond tomorrow -- we have another inflight upgrade of DataFusion here

• https://github.com/influxdata/influxdb_iox/pull/14606

[crepererum]

Given how slow the DF CI is, I'm probably gonna need another day or so.

[epgif]

Given how slow the DF CI is, I'm probably gonna need another day or so.

OK. I'm ready when you are. Do I need to target a different branch?

Thanks!

[epgif]

@alamb @crepererum any update? Thanks!

[crepererum]

We could include this in our fork. That would require:

1. create a "take 3" PR with a new branch that is identical to Patched DF 46.0.1 (take 2) #66
2. cherry-pick the changes from this PR here on top of that
3. update IOx to point to the new PR from step 1 (incl. the change from step 2)

[epgif]

We could include this in our fork. That would require:

1. create a "take 3" PR with a new branch that is identical to Patched DF 46.0.1 (take 2) #66

Hi @crepererum,

I don't know what you mean there. That PR is a draft; where is it going? Who would create this "take 3"?

I don't mind rolling up my sleeves here, but I need a little more guidance.

Thanks!

[crepererum]

We could include this in our fork. That would require:

1. create a "take 3" PR with a new branch that is identical to Patched DF 46.0.1 (take 2) #66

Hi @crepererum,

I don't know what you mean there. That PR is a draft; where is it going? Who would create this "take 3"?

I don't mind rolling up my sleeves here, but I need a little more guidance.

Thanks!

If you can wait a few days more, I'll try to do that myself after the DF 47 upgrade went through. I think having two people working on DF version changes / pins is gonna be a mess.

[epgif]

@crepererum I agree having 2 working on that would be a mess. I'll wait.

Thanks!

[crepererum]

This is included in our pinned DF version as of #68.