fix(web): prevent photo-only memories showing mute button#22802
Merged
danieldietzler merged 1 commit intoimmich-app:mainfrom Oct 15, 2025
Merged
fix(web): prevent photo-only memories showing mute button#22802danieldietzler merged 1 commit intoimmich-app:mainfrom
danieldietzler merged 1 commit intoimmich-app:mainfrom
Conversation
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Currently, the mute button in the memories slideshow is always shown. This doesn't make sense when there aren't any videos. This commit changes the mute button to be only visible if a memory contains at least one video. Other memories aren't taken in consideration; if the current memory is photo-only, the mute button is hidden, and it reappears when viewing the next memory (that contains a video).
Fixes #21355
How Has This Been Tested?
Not sure how to test this, except manually
Screenshots
with mute button, as memory contains video

without mute button, as memory contains only photos

Checklist:
src/services/uses repositories implementations for database calls, filesystem operations, etc.src/repositories/is pretty basic/simple and does not have any immich specific logic (that belongs insrc/services/)Please describe to which degree, if any, an LLM was used in creating this pull request.
None