Skip to content

(MOT-3955) fix(console): restore the missing select option title field - #478

Merged
ytallo merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/select-option-title
Jul 11, 2026
Merged

(MOT-3955) fix(console): restore the missing select option title field#478
ytallo merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/select-option-title

Conversation

@ytallo

@ytallo ytallo commented Jul 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

Main does not build: PermissionModePicker passes a title tooltip on its approval-mode options (landed in #469), but SelectOption never gained the field. tsc -b fails, which breaks pnpm build and therefore the console worker's build.rs web build on any clean checkout.

This adds title?: string to SelectOption and forwards it to the option row as the native tooltip — the behavior #469 intended.

Notes

Refs MOT-3955

#469

PermissionModePicker passes a `title` tooltip on its approval-mode
options since #469, but SelectOption never gained the field, so
`tsc -b` fails on main — and with it `pnpm build` and the console
worker's build.rs web build on any clean checkout.

Add `title?: string` to SelectOption and forward it to the option row
as the native tooltip.
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
workers Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 11, 2026 1:14am
workers-tech-spec Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 11, 2026 1:14am

Request Review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@ytallo, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 57 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c45b1f7f-29e5-442a-ba9a-8335d1dd6b34

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9762471 and 5f91118.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • console/web/src/components/ui/Select.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/select-option-title

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

skill-check — worker

0 verified, 41 skipped (no docs/).

Layer Result
structure
vale
ai
render

Four for four. Nicely done.

@ytallo
ytallo merged commit 116a888 into main Jul 11, 2026
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant