Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add xml reference as button on document page #5908

Closed
1 task done
marcblanchet opened this issue Jul 3, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #5921
Closed
1 task done

add xml reference as button on document page #5908

marcblanchet opened this issue Jul 3, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #5921

Comments

@marcblanchet
Copy link

marcblanchet commented Jul 3, 2023

Description

I always struggle to get the proper <reference> for a draft that I'm referencing in my own draft. I know it is available like in bib.ietf.org (and maybe other places), but I always go to the datatracker for that draft (to know its status, get the right version, ...). It would be very valuable and probably not that lot of work (given already implemented the bibtex button) to have in datatracker/doc/draft-... a new button in the "Formats" line to provide such bibxml info of that draft.

Code of Conduct

@pselkirk
Copy link
Collaborator

pselkirk commented Jul 5, 2023

I just issued a PR for a button. In the meantime, the bibxml is already there (just without a UI), and you can enter the URLs directly, e.g.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-blanchet-dtn-email-over-bp.xml
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-blanchet-dtn-email-over-bp-02.xml

rjsparks pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2023
* feat: Add bibxml button to document info page (#5908)

* fix: No bibxml for RFCs
@BobRichnow

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants