Skip to content

Conversation

@GiudGiud
Copy link
Contributor

@GiudGiud GiudGiud commented Oct 18, 2025

closes #31767
closes #31747

@GiudGiud GiudGiud self-assigned this Oct 18, 2025
@moosebuild
Copy link
Contributor

moosebuild commented Oct 21, 2025

Job Documentation, step Docs: sync website on 682484f wanted to post the following:

View the site here

This comment will be updated on new commits.

@moosebuild
Copy link
Contributor

moosebuild commented Oct 21, 2025

Job Coverage, step Generate coverage on 682484f wanted to post the following:

Framework coverage

17a583 #31748 682484
Total Total +/- New
Rate 85.99% 85.99% +0.00% 100.00%
Hits 123706 123719 +13 19
Misses 20161 20160 -1 0

Diff coverage report

Full coverage report

Modules coverage

Coverage did not change

Full coverage reports

Reports

This comment will be updated on new commits.

@GiudGiud GiudGiud marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2025 19:50
@GiudGiud GiudGiud requested a review from lindsayad as a code owner October 21, 2025 19:50
Comment on lines 1087 to 1088
// if (p == _cached_p2 && (!subdomain_ids || (*subdomain_ids == _cached_subdomain_ids2)))
// return _cached_values2(local_var_index);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we're not going to use them, let's remove all the *2 variables

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah yeah no this is accidental

exodiff = "read_exodus_multiple_vars_out.e"
prereq = "write_exodus_multiple_vars"
issues = "#31238 #31747 #31767"
requirement = "The system shall be able to read in multiple variables from a previous exodus file, leveraging caching and time step interpolation."
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd make this requirement more specific to the solution user object. Basic exodus restart can read multiple variables

- uncomment my code
- make requirement more precise
@GiudGiud GiudGiud requested a review from lindsayad October 22, 2025 22:28
@moosebuild
Copy link
Contributor

Job Test, step Results summary on 682484f wanted to post the following:

Framework test summary

Removed tests

None

Added tests

Test Time (s)
userobjects/solution_user_object.write_exodus_multiple_vars 0.88
userobjects/solution_user_object.read_exodus_multiple_vars 0.78

Run time changes

Test Base (s) Head (s) +/-
tag.not_zeroed_vector_tag 0.71 1.19 +68.56%

Modules test summary

Removed tests

None

Added tests

None

Run time changes

None

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SolutionUO hits an assert when used on INITIAL with a start time requiring time interpolation Make SolutionUO faster for multiple variable lookups

3 participants