rapl: Added RAPL component support for Intel RaptorLake.

[willowec]

Pull Request Description

This PR adds support for the rapl component on Intel's RaptorLake architecture. Adding this was extremely simple as RaptorLake has the same RAPL setup as SandyBridge and IvyBridge.

Tested systems:

System Name	Family/Model/Stepping	papi_native_avail	papi_component_avail	papi_command_line	RAPL tests
Raptor Lake-S/HX B0	0x6/0xb7/0x1

Author Checklist

• Description
  Why this PR exists. Reference all relevant information, including background, issues, test failures, etc
• Commits
  Commits are self contained and only do one thing
  Commits have a header of the form: module: short description
  Commits have a body (whenever relevant) containing a detailed description of the addressed problem and its solution
• Tests
  The PR needs to pass all the tests

[Treece-Burgess]

@willowec How many different CPU's in the Intel RaptorLake family were you able to test on for this change and what exactly did you test?

It would be good if you could test multiple different CPU's in the Intel RaptorLake family and after building the RAPL component, running the utilities: papi_native_avail, papi_component_avail, and papi_command_line to make sure you get the expected results. As well as the tests in rapl/tests/. See PR #275 for how I went about testing to add support for AMD family 25.

[willowec]

@Treece-Burgess I've added the table of tests that I have run, but I only have access to one of the three varieties of RaptorLake machines. I'm glad you pointed this out though, because I when I created this PR I did not know that multiple varieties existed. Would you like me to add the other two varieties without testing them?

[Treece-Burgess]

@willowec If you could add the other two varieties that would be great! Two other comments:

1. Could you order the cases' in ascending order? E.g.:

case 42:
case 58:
case 183:
...

2. In your commit message can you add which RaptorLake's you were able to test on (including the Family/Model/Stepping) and which you were not able to test on (does not need to include the Family/Model/Stepping)? Such that we can use this as a reference later if needed.