-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 247
fix: Evaluation of EXDATE when date-only while DTSTART is date-time
#830
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
06cc119
#829: Reproduce issue with date-only EXDATE not being properly consid…
minichma 40af80e
Fix #829: Don't miss date-only EXDATEs on the same date as `periodStart`
minichma fecb42d
Test: Reproduce issue if EXDATEs of type DATE-only and DATE-TIME are …
minichma 29fd4c4
Evaluation: Fix issue if EXDATEs of type DATE-only and DATE-TIME are …
minichma 095dbb7
Evaluation: Remove unused params `EvaluateExDate(referenceDate)` and …
minichma a061723
Test: Reproduce issue with DATE-only EXDATEs used with RDATEs in diff…
minichma 3095285
#832: Fix issue with DATE-only EXDATEs used with RDATEs in different TZ
minichma File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changing the signature and access modifier would mean a breaking change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Puh, right, theoretically yes. But for this to be an issue, somebody would have to inherit Recurring Evaluator and then call this method. I really wouldn't expect this to be the case. Would wait for potential complaints.