-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
feat: adding server side search support #723
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9d68e43
feat: adding server side search support
anandtiwary 226d131
refactor: addressing review comments
anandtiwary 5ce64a7
refactor: remove hiding search on options length logic
anandtiwary ee0f4de
Merge branch 'main' into multi-select-support-server-search
anandtiwary d00685c
refactor: addressing review comments
anandtiwary 05a6b70
Merge branch 'multi-select-support-server-search' of github.com:hyper…
anandtiwary 065255e
refactor: update comment
anandtiwary File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What if we took a page out of the table api (hah!) and took in some like a searchProvider object instead. We could default it to a client side version, but provide a server implementation in other places.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh god. let me check
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That sounds complicated. Can we do it with just may be a
searchModeenum (Implicit and external)? I think eventually, we would have a separate basic filter multi select component, but we need this as a stepping stone.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK looked at multiselect - the search provider wouldn't work as well because the data is actually coming in as content children vs an array like some of the other components, so an output is the only way that comes to mind to accomplish this - but let's clean up the ambiguity between the two enable search inputs as you mentioned.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so does this look good?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd rather boil down another input and make the enum values more explicit, but same idea:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool.