Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CP(20.03): Fix(increment): Fix readTs less than minTs (#6317) #6518

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2020

Conversation

parasssh
Copy link
Contributor

@parasssh parasssh commented Sep 18, 2020

Use the readTs for reads via LocalCache. This would ensure that users don't get a lot of ReadTs less than MinTs errors. This PR also fixes the flaky test in increment_test.go.

This has a side-effect on posting list cache. That cache would need to understand versioning to be effective.

Co-authored-by: Daniel Mai [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit 2de4675)


This change is Reviewable

Docs Preview: Dgraph Preview

Use the readTs for reads via LocalCache. This would ensure that users don't get a lot of ReadTs less than MinTs errors. This PR also fixes the flaky test in increment_test.go.

This has a side-effect on posting list cache. That cache would need to understand versioning to be effective.

Co-authored-by: Daniel Mai <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 2de4675)
@parasssh parasssh requested review from manishrjain, martinmr and a team as code owners September 18, 2020 18:50
@parasssh parasssh changed the title Fix(increment): Fix readTs less than minTs (#6317) CP(20.03): Fix(increment): Fix readTs less than minTs (#6317) Sep 18, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@martinmr martinmr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewable status: 0 of 6 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @manishrjain and @martinmr)

@parasssh parasssh merged commit 56c50ed into release/v20.03 Sep 18, 2020
@parasssh parasssh deleted the paras/v2003_cp_6317 branch September 18, 2020 19:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants