Skip to content

[vllm compat] Separate renaming from conversion ops#43621

Merged
Cyrilvallez merged 6 commits intomainfrom
separate-renaming-converting
Jan 30, 2026
Merged

[vllm compat] Separate renaming from conversion ops#43621
Cyrilvallez merged 6 commits intomainfrom
separate-renaming-converting

Conversation

@Cyrilvallez
Copy link
Member

@Cyrilvallez Cyrilvallez commented Jan 30, 2026

What does this PR do?

As per the title. Following specs described by @hmellor for vllm compatibility, no logic change should be required. Only the following small changes to mappings should be enough

@Cyrilvallez Cyrilvallez changed the title Separate renaming converting [vllm compat] Separate renaming from conversion ops Jan 30, 2026
@HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev

The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.

@hmellor hmellor added the for patch Tag issues / labels that should be included in the next patch label Jan 30, 2026
Copy link
Collaborator

@ArthurZucker ArthurZucker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't mind, but its not always super convenient when you have a lot of renaming

@Cyrilvallez Cyrilvallez merged commit de4958e into main Jan 30, 2026
24 of 26 checks passed
@Cyrilvallez Cyrilvallez deleted the separate-renaming-converting branch January 30, 2026 15:37
@hmellor
Copy link
Member

hmellor commented Jan 30, 2026

but its not always super convenient when you have a lot of renaming

Some day I plan to support WeightConverter as well as WeightRenaming in vLLM so this won't be a problem. But for now I only have a WIP for WeightRenaming

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

for patch Tag issues / labels that should be included in the next patch

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants