add Gemma2 for causal LM to test classes #32558
Closed
+1
−1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ArthurZucker
reviewed
Aug 9, 2024
Collaborator
ArthurZucker
left a comment
ArthurZucker
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That is probably me, given the cache format we skipped the tests as too many were failing.
|
The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. |
Contributor
Author
|
Right, I'm seeing the CI go redder and redder 😅 , might not be relevant to add then - I'll close this PR and we can rely on the other specific test from #32493 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Generate tests depend on the attribute
all_generative_model_classes, which was empty for Gemma2, causing all generate tests to be skipped.Q additional maybe @gante : do you think it'd be useful to use the lists in
modeling_auto.pyinstead?