-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.7k
[time series] updated expected values for integration test. #21762
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f507050
updated expected
kashif e59d932
prediction_length fix
kashif 2b609f3
prediction_length default value
kashif 068c12c
default prediction_length 24
kashif d9bedca
revert back prediction_length default
kashif ac6db63
move prediction_length test
kashif File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sgugger: @kashif originally thought a few arguments of this config's
__init__should be positional arguments.to_json_stringwill callto_diff_dictthenself.__class__().to_dict()(so we always need to makeconfig_class()works without specifying any arg)TimeSeriesTransformerModelhas no real, well-known checkpoint, see below)Is my understanding above correct?
As for
TimeSeriesTransformerModel, there is no checkpoint, it's just @kashif trains a model on a tourism dataset quickly (3-5 minutes) and uploaded. And we just set values likeprediction_length (int, defaults to 24):according to that one.He says
24has no real meaning, and the plan is to train models on all the time series datasets.But I think it is fine (and we have to) put some default values anyway, and users can change them for their own datasets.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not leave it as
Nonethen?Yes we can't have config arguments that are positional, since the Transformers library is a library of pretrained model. So every argument of the config has a default corresponding to a canonical checkpoint associated to that model. This is quite an exceptional situation here for time series, as normally a model with no canonical checkpoint is not even accepted in the library ;-)
Leaving the argument as None is probably the way to go, and you can then assert in the config code if you want to force the user to always pass it.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, thank you for spending time explain to me (us)❤️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not a problem!