Editorial changes to Safe Method With Body

[hawkinsw]

A minor typographical fix and slight rephrasing of limitations of current query-embedded-in-request-URI method.

[hawkinsw]

I hope that I have followed the proper procedures for proposing (and labeling) an editorial suggestion. I hope that this is helpful!

[reschke]

Yes, that's the right procedure!

I think the change goes into the right direction.

Two issues though:

• you lost some of the original text, can you add that?
• XML: <ul> is a block-level element and needs to be pulled outside the <t>.

[hawkinsw]

Yes, that's the right procedure!

I think the change goes into the right direction.

Two issues though:

* you lost some of the original text, can you add that?

My goal was to reflow the content into those three bullets. Did I accidentally delete other content while doing that? If so, I am very sorry!

* XML: <ul> is a block-level element and needs to be pulled outside the <t>.

I believe that I fixed this issue! Sorry!

I made sure that everything compiled with this version (as opposed to the first version -- sorry!)

I hope that this helps!
Will

[martinthomson]

Some more suggestions, but small ones.

[hawkinsw]

Thank you @martinthomson ! I incorporated all those helpful suggestions!

[reschke]

Will,

1. could you restore "Often these limits are not known or discoverable ahead of...."?
2. I'm not sure we want to reference NO-VARY-SEARCH; maybe you can open a separate ticket/PR, so we can discuss this separately?

[hawkinsw]

Will,

1. could you restore "Often these limits are not known or discoverable ahead of...."?

2. I'm not sure we want to reference NO-VARY-SEARCH; maybe you can open a separate ticket/PR, so we can discuss this separately?

Absolutely! I was just trying to respond to @martinthomson !! I will send another version in the next few hours! Sorry for the trouble.