Conversation
|
Shouldnt core be the first card? |
|
It's the Supervisor panel, IMO all other "sections" are secondary information |
|
I agree with Bram. It feels more logical to have Core -> Supervisor -> Host (or Host -> Supervisor -> Core) in order of the way they are stacked. (BTW, freaking nice addition, will help to resolve versioning understanding issues). |
|
For me, personally, either works. The last one (host first) feels more focused on the Supervisor panel maybe, so that might be better. |
|
Personally, I would still prefer core first, but I can also live with this. I'm afraid people will reboot the host more now. |
|
@bramkragten Haha that is actually a valid concern 😓 |
|
reordered, and added confirmation dialogs to core/su restart |
|
One last nitpicks, can we change the wording on the buttons?
etc |


Breaking change
Proposed change
Add a Core card to supervisor/system.
With both core and supervisor using calver, the confusion continues, hopefully, this will make things clearer.
Action buttons have also been prefixed, like "Supervisor restart"
The metrics card is removed and the metrics are inserted at the bottom of their respective cards.
Type of change
Example configuration
Additional information
Checklist
If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed: