Hash translation files#2652
Merged
Merged
Conversation
ghost
assigned
Member
Author
|
@armills do you remember why we didn't do this from the beginning? |
Contributor
|
I think we were just matching the build pipeline we had at the time, where we used the backend fingerprinting for a lot more. I don't think there's any reason we can't use gulp to hash these. |
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Store the translation files with hashes in the filename. This were the last files that was still using the fake fingerprinting that the backed had integrated. We can drop that now.