Bump pydaikin 2.10.5#95656
Conversation
|
Hey there @fredrike, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration ( Code owner commandsCode owners of
|
|
Just realized there are no tests for the unique id migration. We should have at least a basic test for this as these tend to be hard to fix later if something goes wrong |
bdraco
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice! Looks like there is a stale docstring to fix
|
Looks good 👍 It would be nice to cover that one line before merging |
I'm not sure if I can cover that line, should I unnest the function to allow testing? |
|
Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍 |
|
Just wondering if this made it into Core 2023.7.0. I just tried and the 4/3 parameter issue is still there. Happy to assist with logs etc if anyone needs them. |
|
I've tagged the PR for the next patch release. |
Proposed change
Bump Daikin version, changelog: https://bitbucket.org/mustang51/pydaikin/branches/compare/v2.10.5%0Dv2.9.0
Add zone temperature control.
Type of change
Additional information
Checklist
black --fast homeassistant tests)If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:
If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:
Updated and included derived files by running:
python3 -m script.hassfest.requirements_all.txt.Updated by running
python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all..coveragerc.To help with the load of incoming pull requests: