Only test for EncryptedBridge in Samsung J/H models

[epenet]

Proposed change

Only test for EncryptedBridge in Samsung J/H models

Type of change

• Dependency upgrade
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New integration (thank you!)
• New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
• Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
• Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

• This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes
• This PR is related to issue: Can't turn off samsung tv anymore, logging says: Unknown power_off command ... #70708
• Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• There is no commented out code in this PR.
• I have followed the development checklist
• The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated for www.home-assistant.io

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

• The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
  Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
• New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
  Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
• For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.
• Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

The integration reached or maintains the following Integration Quality Scale:

• No score or internal
• 🥈 Silver
• 🥇 Gold
• 🏆 Platinum

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

• I have reviewed two other open pull requests in this repository.

[probot-home-assistant]

Hey there @chemelli74, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (samsungtv) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
_{^{(message by CodeOwnersMention)}}

[bdraco]

Tested with UN75JU641D. The tv is no longer turning off.

I'm out of time to debug though

[bdraco]

I think its the other problem where the token doesn't work after powering off when the session id is 1

[bdraco]

                "data": {
                    "host": "192.168.107.76",
                    "mac": "f8:04:2e:e1:9f:18",
                    "manufacturer": "Samsung Electronics",
                    "method": "encrypted",
                    "model": "UN75JU641D",
                    "name": "Living room",
                    "port": 8000,
                    "ssdp_rendering_control_location": "http://192.168.107.76:9197/dmr",
                    "ssdp_main_tv_agent_location": "http://192.168.107.76:7677/MainTVServer2/",
                    "token": "7f86e2b4db18a675a5c6a37ef74dcaf2",
                    "session_id": "1"
                },

[bdraco]

Its still using the encrypted bridge

2022-05-04 16:26:51 DEBUG (MainThread) [homeassistant.components.samsungtv] Create SamsungTVEncryptedBridge for 192.168.107.76
2022-05-04 16:26:53 DEBUG (MainThread) [homeassistant.components.samsungtv] Created SamsungTVEncryptedBridge for 192.168.107.76
2022-05-04 16:26:53 DEBUG (MainThread) [homeassistant.components.samsungtv] App list request is not supported on encrypted TV: 192.168.107.76

[bdraco]

Are we solving the right problem here? Is problem that the session is expired aka the session id 1 does not survive a power off ?

[bdraco]

Discussed on discord and agreed: Since websocket is the newer method it should be preferred regardless

We still need to fix the J/H models not working after power off because of session id 1, but it shouldn't block this PR