Skip to content

Add number entity to Overkiz integration#62732

Merged
bdraco merged 7 commits intohome-assistant:devfrom
iMicknl:overkiz/add_number
Dec 24, 2021
Merged

Add number entity to Overkiz integration#62732
bdraco merged 7 commits intohome-assistant:devfrom
iMicknl:overkiz/add_number

Conversation

@iMicknl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@iMicknl iMicknl commented Dec 24, 2021

Proposed change

Adds number entity to Overkiz platform, mainly for setting configuration parameters like my position.

This PR will also address a late review, with a small improvement for all platforms sharing the same asyn_setup_entry logic.

Screen Shot 2021-12-24 at 11 09 05

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.
  • Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

The integration reached or maintains the following Integration Quality Scale:

  • No score or internal
  • 🥈 Silver
  • 🥇 Gold
  • 🏆 Platinum

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@probot-home-assistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey there @vlebourl, @tetienne, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (overkiz) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
(message by CodeOwnersMention)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@epenet epenet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is better to keep the new entity description classes inside the number platform.

@epenet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

epenet commented Dec 24, 2021

Also, I would have created a separate PR for the cleanup of button and sensor, in order to keep the PRs smaller and keep the focus.

@iMicknl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

iMicknl commented Dec 24, 2021

Also, I would have created a separate PR for the cleanup of button and sensor, in order to keep the PRs smaller and keep the focus.

I will remove the cleanup and address it in a seperate PR, together with your other comments! 👍🏻

@bdraco bdraco merged commit c37077a into home-assistant:dev Dec 24, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 25, 2021
@iMicknl iMicknl deleted the overkiz/add_number branch December 26, 2021 12:03
@epenet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

epenet commented Dec 27, 2021

I will remove the cleanup and address it in a seperate PR, together with your other comments! 👍🏻

Remember to create the cleanup PR...

hass: HomeAssistant,
entry: ConfigEntry,
async_add_entities: AddEntitiesCallback,
):
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing return value typing.

) -> None:

if state := self.device.states.get(self.entity_description.key):
return state.value

return 0
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we default to 0 instead of None?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants