Skip to content

Use DeviceInfo Class S#58338

Closed
tkdrob wants to merge 5 commits intohome-assistant:devfrom
tkdrob:deviceinfo-s
Closed

Use DeviceInfo Class S#58338
tkdrob wants to merge 5 commits intohome-assistant:devfrom
tkdrob:deviceinfo-s

Conversation

@tkdrob
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tkdrob tkdrob commented Oct 24, 2021

Breaking change

Proposed change

Use DeviceInfo Class S

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.
  • Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

The integration reached or maintains the following Integration Quality Scale:

  • No score or internal
  • 🥈 Silver
  • 🥇 Gold
  • 🏆 Platinum

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@tkdrob tkdrob marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2021 20:37
@frenck frenck added the smash Indicator this PR is close to finish for merging or closing label Oct 25, 2021
"""Initialize the instance."""
self._device = device
self._dispatcher_remove = None
self._attr_device_info = DeviceInfo(
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a functional change, things like name won't update anymore. Was this intentional?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have smartthings and my testing confirms integration is functional as before except for the obvious, no name updates.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But that is intentional?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, @andrewsayre as the codeowner of the smartthings integration, do you agree?

@frenck frenck removed the smash Indicator this PR is close to finish for merging or closing label Oct 25, 2021
@frenck frenck added the smash Indicator this PR is close to finish for merging or closing label Oct 25, 2021
@frenck
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

frenck commented Oct 26, 2021

Not all comments have been processed.

@frenck frenck removed the smash Indicator this PR is close to finish for merging or closing label Oct 26, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants