Clean up superfluous integration setup - part 1

[frenck]

🚫 Depends on / Blocked by #48381, needs to be rebased after that one is merged.

Proposed change

#48381 remove the need for an integration setup or async_setup in case the integration provides a async_setup_entry. For example:

async def async_setup(hass, config):
    """Component setup, do nothing."""
    return True

This PR is cleanup for those.

Type of change

• Dependency upgrade
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New integration (thank you!)
• New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
• Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
• Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Checklist

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• There is no commented out code in this PR.
• I have followed the development checklist
• The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated for www.home-assistant.io

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

• The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
  Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
• New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
  Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
• Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

The integration reached or maintains the following Integration Quality Scale:

• No score or internal
• 🥈 Silver
• 🥇 Gold
• 🏆 Platinum

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

• I have reviewed two other open pull requests in this repository.

[MartinHjelmare]

Can we wait with these until the dependency is merged?

[MartinHjelmare]

At this point they are just spam since I assume you're not looking for advice on the code.

[frenck]

At this point they are just spam since I assume you're not looking for advice on the code.

I am.

[MartinHjelmare]

What do you want advice on?

[frenck]

It is ready for review, as I'm done on my end.

[MartinHjelmare]

We can't do a proper review until it's rebased. We don't even know if the dependency will be merged yet. So unless there's a specific question this PR is not needed until the dependency is merged, in my opinion.