Change Plugwise integration to plugwise module

[CoMPaTech]

Proposed change

Final changes before we can draft the successor of #35713 - Some background to this PR. As requested in #35713 we joined forces but as a team decided to not only merge the HA-code but also our module! As such this PR swaps Plugwise_Smile for plugwise. To keep changes to a minimum this PR only adjusts the current integration for usage of the new module.

• Changelog of the new module (including predecessors)
• Dependency (as per above) switched from lxml to defusedxml (improving security)
• Final plumbing/placeholders for USB integration
• Adding new tests (exceptions changed due to the merged new module, upsetting codecov - so tests specifically for the renamed exceptions were added).
• Adding @brefra to CODEOWNERS

For reviewers, to clarify why we use async_setup_entry as a wrapper in switch.py will default to the current workings unless PW_TYPE is set to USB. (Hence the placeholder stub).

Type of change

• Dependency upgrade
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New integration (thank you!)
• New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
• Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
• Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

• This PR fixes or closes issue:
• This PR is related to issue: Add Plugwise USB-stick integration #35713
• Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• There is no commented out code in this PR.
• I have followed the [development checklist][dev-checklist]
• The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated for [www.home-assistant.io][docs-repository]

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

• The [manifest file][manifest-docs] has all fields filled out correctly.
  Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
• New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
  Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
• Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

• I have reviewed two other [open pull requests][prs] in this repository.

[probot-home-assistant]

Hey there @bouwew, mind taking a look at this pull request as its been labeled with an integration (plugwise) you are listed as a codeowner for? Thanks!
_{^{(message by CodeOwnersMention)}}

[bouwew]

One small improvement possible.

[bouwew]

Looking good now after the changes.

[CoMPaTech]

Looking good now after the changes.

Only added tests to pass patch coverage - waiting for open PR to 'ready for review'

[deltachonglee81]

Thank you so much

On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 4:29 PM, Tom ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. ------------------------------ In tests/components/plugwise/test_switch.py <#43036 (comment)>: > + entry = await async_init_integration(hass, mock_smile_adam) + assert entry.state == ENTRY_STATE_LOADED + + await hass.services.async_call( + "switch", + "turn_off", + {"entity_id": "switch.cv_pomp"}, + blocking=True, + ) + state = hass.states.get("switch.cv_pomp") + assert str(state.state) == "on" + + await hass.services.async_call( + "switch", + "turn_on", + {"entity_id": "switch.fibaro_hc2"}, link/loc of fixture source <https://github.com/plugwise/python-plugwise/blob/6e340ce4957cc3415658ddf4ccb7c34046ad7090/userdata/adam_multiple_devices_per_zone/core.domain_objects.xml#L3255> — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#43036 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARUZXJV5DBT6ELBYY4PJ4DDSQNPELANCNFSM4TQNFHDA> .

-- Mail from Gmail

[ctalkington]

was it intended to assert something here?

[ctalkington]

ill go ahead and approve this, just double check this test in your usb branch or next PR.

[CoMPaTech]

@ctalkington will do in the usb-branch coming up