Add more system information from Supervisor

[frenck]

Proposed change

This PR add more system information:

Left = new, Right = current

It enriches the info panel with information about the installation type, so users can look that up easily.

Furthermore, it has been enriched with information from the Supervisor.
It now can show:

• Host Operating System
• Chassis (e.g., vm or embedded)
• Supervisor version

ps: In the above screenshot docker and venv are not correct, since I'm connected to a remote Supervisor with my local Python dev environment in a venv.

Type of change

• Dependency upgrade
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New integration (thank you!)
• New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
• Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
• Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Example entry for configuration.yaml:

# Example configuration.yaml

Additional information

• This PR fixes or closes issue: closes Update helpers/system_info.py to detect HassOS #35500
• This PR is related to issue:
• Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• There is no commented out code in this PR.
• I have followed the development checklist
• The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated for www.home-assistant.io

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

• The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
  Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
• New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
  Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
• Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

The integration reached or maintains the following Integration Quality Scale:

• No score or internal
• 🥈 Silver
• 🥇 Gold
• 🏆 Platinum

[probot-home-assistant]

Hey there @home-assistant/hass-io, mind taking a look at this pull request as its been labeled with a integration (hassio) you are listed as a codeowner for? Thanks!
_{^{(message by CodeOwnersMention)}}

[balloob]

Should we do this? I think it would be better to make it fail as it's an unexpected situation. Integrations should depend on hassio if they want to call its methods.

[frenck]

I know... right now it uses .get() so I assumed it is expected to be None at some point. I wanted to keep that type of "risk" out of the loop now.

We should look at the integration anyways, as some things changed at the Supervisor (new endpoint and variables) that still need to be adjusted.

[BradleyFord]

What would be really nice is to have a copy/paste button that gives you the content and formatting that is perfect for pasting into a Github ticket...then the devs always get what they need.

[frenck]

Yes, but that is a frontend thing, this was a backend thing.