Move imports in wake_on_lan component

[djpremier]

Description:

Moved imports from functions to top-level as requested in #27284

Checklist:

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass with tox. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• There is no commented out code in this PR.
• I have followed the development checklist

[fabaff]

Duplicate of #27415

[djpremier]

@fabaff, thanks for returning. But I know that this pull is duplicated, I did it to correct the tests, since @inverse didn't give any answer already 12 days ago

[inverse]

@djpremier it was 5 days not 12 :/

@balloob - is there a policy on the time for dupes?

[djpremier]

Hi @inverse, I believe there is no time policy, I commented there because it is the information that is appearing to me here on Git (https://ibb.co/D42Z0HQ). As you did not respond, I decided to make the changes so that the issue could be closed as soon as possible, we are an Open Source community, we are here to help, sorry if I offended you in any way, it was not my intention.

[inverse]

@djpremier I think there should be some policies around "trumping" PR's etc since that could demotivate people from contributing which would have an much more negative effect on an Open Source community than closing issues "as soon as possible".

[frenck]

@inverse We don't have a policy for that, nor do I personally think that is needed.

I'm sorry to hear that this has happened, however, this PR did pass the CI, the other didn't. It makes sense to merge the passing contribution. Closing it by saying: "Nope, great PR, but there is a dupe that needs to be fixed first" is awkward as well.

In the end, what matters is that we move forward, so everybody can enjoy this great piece of software. This is not a competition. We value every contributor and contribution. Merged or not merged doesn't matter.

So let me close by saying; Thanks @inverse, please don't be sad and I would definitely hope to see a contribution from you sometime again. ❤️