Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Fast checked-indicator color #7341

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024
Merged

Fix Fast checked-indicator color #7341

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

MarcSkovMadsen
Copy link
Collaborator

Before

image

After

image

image

@MarcSkovMadsen MarcSkovMadsen changed the title Adds back Fast checked-indicator color in dark theme Fix Fast checked-indicator color Sep 29, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.20%. Comparing base (114a60d) to head (46b9582).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7341      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.22%   82.20%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         337      337              
  Lines       50503    50503              
==========================================
- Hits        41527    41516      -11     
- Misses       8976     8987      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@MarcSkovMadsen MarcSkovMadsen added this to the next milestone Sep 29, 2024
@philippjfr philippjfr merged commit 07481b9 into main Oct 1, 2024
17 checks passed
@philippjfr philippjfr deleted the fix/checked-indicator branch October 1, 2024 07:25
@philippjfr philippjfr modified the milestones: next, v1.5.x Oct 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants