Added explicit comparison to JS #3168
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3168 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 83.17% 82.98% -0.20%
==========================================
Files 247 192 -55
Lines 36337 25502 -10835
==========================================
- Hits 30224 21163 -9061
+ Misses 6113 4339 -1774
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. see 235 files with indirect coverage changes 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
|
|
||
| - Does the app depend on sources of data or other tools already available in Python? If so it will normally be much easier to build in a Python framework like Panel. | ||
|
|
||
| - Do the people building the app normally work in Python? If so, they are likely to be much more productive in Python, both directly for writing the app's code and indirectly by being able to use all of their usual support tools and infrastructure (and from not having to learn JS). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In trading the users (i.e. traders) often have the requirement that they need to be able to read and review the app. They are actually responsible for what ever happens in the app whether its a model providing insights or prescriptions or whether its a button that triggers an algo to start trading by sending data to a REST API. So Python is a good choice for the entire app.
Added a section to comparisons.rst comparing and contrasting using Panel with developing directly in JavaScript/HTML/CSS.