-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: cycle through function signatures/overloads #9974
Merged
pascalkuthe
merged 1 commit into
helix-editor:master
from
karthago1:cycle-function-signature
Apr 16, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that we should prefer the
active_signature
we get from the language server here instead:Some language servers update the
active_signature
they send when you enter enough parameters. For example with Erlang you might be typingmaps:get(
which is a multiarity function.maps:get(a, b
should show the signature ofmaps:get/2
(takes 2 arguments) but formaps:get(a, b,
the language server will showmaps:get/3
.We could make this more complicated though and separately track which signature the language server sends and which you navigate to with A-n/A-p, preferring the signature you navigate to until the server changes which signature it considers active.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have played with your code. My c++ LSP somehow doesn't update the active signature at all. it is always
0
.so IMO it is very annoying to switch to the right signature manually, then it switches always back to the first one.
but in the same time using the C# LSP your code brings some improvements, since the suggested LSP signature is in most cases useful.
I created #10655, which implements the bit more complicated solution you have suggested