You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Q&A discussions are supposed to be left open, so that other people can look up the answers as well. It would be cool if you could mark something as an answer though. Thanks!
I think I came up with a good way to deal with this in a better way. At least it makes sense to me at the moment ;)
NEW: Rename "Static section" to Source cut (because that's its function ... to cut the original audio file in a non-destructive way, cropping away material from the start and end, that cropped-away material will not be visible in Playtime's waveform viewer)
NEW: Rename "Dynamic section" to Section (a section that can be played with as part of a live performance)
Always auto-fade sections (this is already the case). Rationale: Sections can change in unforeseen ways ... the section start and end can be anywhere. So it always makes sense to auto-fade, in order to avoid click noises.
Apply "Source fades" (if enabled) at start and end of source file (already the case) or the source cut respectively (NEW ... before that, the source cut fades would always be applied).
When recording audio within Playtime, enable source fades and set the source cut accordingly (already the case).
NEW: When importing audio from a file, disable "Source fades" and don't change the source cut.
When importing audio from an item, set the source cut according to the take offset and item length (already done).
If item has a fade (> 0ms) at its start, enable "Source fades" (it will not be exactly the same fade, but enough to avoid clicks).
NEW: If item doesn't have a fade at its tart, disable "Source fades" (this in particular would have prevented your issue).
No need to comment on that, unless you see something weird (this is more like a todo list for myself).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Great!
Q&A discussions are supposed to be left open, so that other people can look up the answers as well. It would be cool if you could mark something as an answer though. Thanks!
I think I came up with a good way to deal with this in a better way. At least it makes sense to me at the moment ;)
No need to comment on that, unless you see something weird (this is more like a todo list for myself).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: