SRE-868: Replace cargo:wasm-opt with prebuilt Binaryen in mise config by claude[bot] · Pull Request #9105 · hashintel/hash

claude · 2026-07-27T12:24:06Z

Requested by Ciaran Morinan, Tim Diekmann · Slack thread

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Before: every Vercel frontend build spent ~6m54s — roughly 75% of the 9-minute install phase — compiling the wasm-opt crate from source. cargo-binstall can never find a prebuilt binary for it, because the crates.io wasm-opt crate (brson/wasm-opt-rs) publishes no release binaries; the real prebuilt wasm-opt binaries live in WebAssembly/binaryen releases.

After: wasm-opt comes from the prebuilt Binaryen version_131 release binaries on every platform — Vercel installs, CI, and the linux/arm64 Docker image builds (version_131 is the first Binaryen release that ships an aarch64-linux asset). Downloads take seconds, and cargo:wasm-opt is removed entirely: one tool, one version, everywhere.

How: "github:WebAssembly/binaryen" = "version_131" uses mise's github backend to install release assets directly. The aqua backend was considered first (its registry converts Binaryen's version_131-style tags, which keeps renovate updates working, per Bilal) — but the aqua registry constrains binaryen ≥ 108 to supported_envs: [darwin, amd64] and has no arm64→aarch64 asset-name mapping for linux, so aqua:WebAssembly/binaryen fails on linux/arm64 at any version and can't serve the arm64 Docker builds. An upstream aqua-registry PR adding linux/arm64 support would allow switching back later.

The mise.lock entries are hand-authored for all four platforms (linux-x64, linux-arm64, macos-arm64, macos-x64 — version_131 publishes assets for all of them). Checksums were taken from the sha256 digests GitHub displays on the release page and cross-checked against the .sha256 companion assets (they match for all four). The tarball's nested binaryen-version_131/bin/ layout is handled by mise's automatic strip_components + bin-directory detection, so wasm-opt lands on PATH via mise shims and wasm-pack finds it as before.

🔗 Related links

Linear: SRE-868
Root-cause discussion: Slack thread (internal)
Upstream crate without release binaries: https://github.com/brson/wasm-opt-rs
Binaryen release used: https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/releases/tag/version_131

🔍 What does this change?

.config/mise/config.toml: replaces both "aqua:WebAssembly/binaryen" = "version_116" and "cargo:wasm-opt" = "0.116.1" with a single "github:WebAssembly/binaryen" = "version_131"
.config/mise/mise.lock: removes the cargo:wasm-opt and aqua Binaryen entries; adds github:WebAssembly/binaryen entries for linux-x64, linux-arm64, macos-arm64, and macos-x64 (URL + sha256 each)
apps/{hash-api,hash-frontend,hash-ai-worker-ts,hash-integration-worker}/docker/Dockerfile: swap cargo:wasm-opt → github:WebAssembly/binaryen in the mise install --locked tool list (these images build for linux/arm64, now covered by the aarch64-linux asset)
apps/hash-frontend/vercel-install.sh and apps/petrinaut-website/vercel-install.sh: swap aqua:WebAssembly/binaryen → github:WebAssembly/binaryen

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph

⚠️ Known issues

Version jump 116 → 131: the builds previously used binaryen 116 (crate 0.116.1); they now use binaryen 131. wasm-pack invokes wasm-opt identically, but the optimizer itself is 15 releases newer.
Renovate: the github backend tracks release tags verbatim (version_131), unlike the aqua registry's tag conversion — the renovate mise manager may need a check that it picks up version_... tags for this tool; if not, updates are a one-line manual bump.
The lock entries have no url_api asset-id fields (api.github.com for WebAssembly/binaryen is unreachable from the sandbox this was authored in). mise lock on a dev machine would normalize the entries if wanted — CI's mise install --locked will tell if the hand-authored form is insufficient.
Dev machines running a full mise install will download the Binaryen tarball (~86 MB on linux-x64, ~7 MB on macOS).

🐾 Next steps

Tim floated removing the "ancient wasm-setup for the type system" entirely in the Slack thread — if that lands, github:WebAssembly/binaryen and cargo:wasm-pack can be dropped altogether.
Optional: upstream an aqua-registry PR adding linux/arm64 (aarch64 replacement) support for binaryen ≥ 131, then switch back to aqua: for registry-managed renovate updates.

🛡 What tests cover this?

CI runs mise install --env ci --jobs 1 --locked on linux-x64, which installs the tool from the locked URL and verifies its checksum.
The four service Docker image builds run mise install --locked … github:WebAssembly/binaryen on linux/arm64, exercising the aarch64-linux lock entry.

❓ How to test this?

Check the Vercel preview builds on this PR: the install phase should drop from ~9 min to ~2 min (no more cargo:wasm-opt compile).
In the build log, github:WebAssembly/binaryen should install in seconds and wasm-pack builds should still find wasm-opt.
Trigger a service Docker image build: the arm64 build should install Binaryen from the aarch64-linux asset instead of compiling the crate.

vercel · 2026-07-27T12:24:15Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview	Aug 1, 2026 6:54pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview	Aug 1, 2026 6:54pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Aug 1, 2026 6:54pm

codecov · 2026-08-01T15:26:55Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.58%. Comparing base (af5e3eb) to head (51f1224).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9105   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.58%   59.58%           
=======================================
  Files        1410     1410           
  Lines      137980   137980           
  Branches     6494     6494           
=======================================
+ Hits        82210    82212    +2     
+ Misses      54734    54732    -2     
  Partials     1036     1036

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.99% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`12.57% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.49% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`2.55% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`10.02% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`12.25% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.89% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.23% <ø> (+0.03%)`	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`7.37% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.59% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-embeddings	`91.88% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`29.66% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`42.16% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`84.71% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`89.63% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`28.39% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`78.98% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.51% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`79.82% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.09% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`87.92% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.04% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed · 2026-08-01T15:31:35Z

Merging this PR will improve performance by 18.18%

⚠️

Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 96 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
⚡	`bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64]`	170 ns	140.8 ns	+20.71%
⚡	`bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200]`	215 ns	185.8 ns	+15.7%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

_{Comparing claude/sre-868-wasm-opt-prebuilt (51f1224) with main (9b60522)}

…alls Every Vercel build spent ~6m54s compiling the wasm-opt crate from source because cargo-binstall finds no prebuilt binary for it. Install wasm-opt from the WebAssembly/binaryen release binaries (aqua backend) instead, keeping version parity (crate 0.116.1 = binaryen version_116). The Docker images keep cargo:wasm-opt: they build natively for linux/arm64, where Binaryen publishes no release asset.

Use mise's github backend to install prebuilt Binaryen release binaries on every platform, including linux/arm64 (aarch64-linux asset shipped since version_131). This removes the cargo:wasm-opt crate build - the last consumer was the Docker images - so wasm-opt is now one tool at one version everywhere: CI, Vercel installs, and Docker image builds. The aqua backend was considered (registry tags are renovate-friendly) but the aqua registry does not support linux/arm64 for binaryen >= 108, which the arm64 Docker builds need. Lock entries are hand-authored from the release page digests and the .sha256 companion assets (verified to match).

github-actions · 2026-08-01T20:00:42Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.337 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$13.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.382 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 401 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.591 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$25.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.505 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 221 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.289 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.274 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 116 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.589 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.048 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.053 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.398 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.465 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.136 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.988 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.154 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.020 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.969 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.614 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.368 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.098 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.883 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.217 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.843 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.538 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.278 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.014 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.454 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.790 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$44.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 220 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.196 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$34.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.512 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$37.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$33.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-27.080 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$44.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$51.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.450 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$42.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.339 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$90.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 595 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.692 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.633 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$282 \mathrm{ms} \pm 923 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.632 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.339 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.527 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.060 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.953 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.061 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.621 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.192 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$11.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.526 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$12.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$12.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.462 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$12.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$11.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.711 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.846 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.832 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$12.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.357 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.909 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.085 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.752 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$58.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 456 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.745 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$113 \mathrm{ms} \pm 613 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.027 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$66.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 510 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.739 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$76.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 555 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.923 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$85.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 587 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.231 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$91.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 630 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.417 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$45.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.649 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$74.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 423 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.180 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$51.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.622 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 357 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.071 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.080 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.567 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 781 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.733 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$128 \mathrm{ms} \pm 585 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 125 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.011 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$541 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.58 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.764 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

cursor · 2026-08-01T22:30:21Z

PR Summary

Low Risk
Tooling-only change to how wasm-opt is installed; low runtime risk aside from possible WASM output differences from the Binaryen version bump.

Overview
Replaces source-built wasm-opt with prebuilt Binaryen so Vercel and Docker installs no longer spend several minutes compiling the cargo:wasm-opt crate.

Mise now pins github:WebAssembly/binaryen at version_131, with locked download URLs and checksums for linux-x64, linux-arm64, macos-x64, and macos-arm64 in mise.lock. cargo:wasm-opt is removed from the shared mise config.

Dockerfiles (hash-api, hash-frontend, hash-ai-worker-ts, hash-integration-worker) and Vercel install scripts (hash-frontend, petrinaut-website) swap cargo:wasm-opt (or the prior aqua binaryen reference) for github:WebAssembly/binaryen in their mise install --locked tool lists so wasm-pack still gets wasm-opt on PATH.

Note: optimizer version moves from the old ~116 line to Binaryen 131, which may slightly change WASM optimization output.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 51f1224. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

Copilot

Pull request overview

Replaces source-built wasm-opt with prebuilt Binaryen assets to reduce installation time across CI, Vercel, and Docker builds.

Changes:

Pins Binaryen version_131 through mise’s GitHub backend.
Adds checksummed lock entries for Linux and macOS architectures.
Updates Vercel and Docker installation commands.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 8 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
`.config/mise/config.toml`	Configures prebuilt Binaryen.
`.config/mise/mise.lock`	Locks platform-specific Binaryen assets.
`apps/hash-api/docker/Dockerfile`	Installs Binaryen in API builds.
`apps/hash-frontend/docker/Dockerfile`	Installs Binaryen in frontend builds.
`apps/hash-ai-worker-ts/docker/Dockerfile`	Installs Binaryen in AI worker builds.
`apps/hash-integration-worker/docker/Dockerfile`	Installs Binaryen in integration worker builds.
`apps/hash-frontend/vercel-install.sh`	Uses Binaryen during Vercel installation.
`apps/petrinaut-website/vercel-install.sh`	Uses Binaryen during Vercel installation.

github-actions Bot added area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team area/apps labels Jul 27, 2026

claude Bot assigned TimDiekmann Jul 27, 2026

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens July 27, 2026 12:26 Inactive

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut July 27, 2026 12:28 Inactive

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash July 27, 2026 12:37

View deployment

github-actions Bot added area/apps > hash-api Affects the HASH API (app) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team labels Jul 27, 2026

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens July 27, 2026 12:47 Inactive

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut July 27, 2026 12:50 Inactive

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash July 27, 2026 12:59

View deployment

claude Bot force-pushed the claude/sre-868-wasm-opt-prebuilt branch from bfb4f7a to 84cff8d Compare August 1, 2026 15:22

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens August 1, 2026 15:24 Inactive

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut August 1, 2026 15:27 Inactive

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash August 1, 2026 15:37

View deployment

claude added 2 commits August 1, 2026 18:39

claude Bot force-pushed the claude/sre-868-wasm-opt-prebuilt branch from 84cff8d to 51f1224 Compare August 1, 2026 18:40

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens August 1, 2026 18:42 Inactive

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut August 1, 2026 18:45 Inactive

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash August 1, 2026 18:54

View deployment

TimDiekmann marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2026 22:30

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 1, 2026 22:30

TimDiekmann approved these changes Aug 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of TimDiekmann August 1, 2026 22:30

View session

Copilot AI reviewed Aug 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

TimDiekmann added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 1, 2026

Merged via the queue into main with commit 60caa1d Aug 1, 2026
190 checks passed

TimDiekmann deleted the claude/sre-868-wasm-opt-prebuilt branch August 1, 2026 22:53

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

SRE-868: Replace cargo:wasm-opt with prebuilt Binaryen in mise config - #9105

SRE-868: Replace cargo:wasm-opt with prebuilt Binaryen in mise config#9105
TimDiekmann merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude/sre-868-wasm-opt-prebuilt

claude Bot commented Jul 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Jul 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

This branch was successfully deployed

Reviewers

Uh oh!

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Conversation

claude Bot commented Jul 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

⚠️ Known issues

🐾 Next steps

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Jul 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will improve performance by 18.18%

Performance Changes

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

This branch was successfully deployed

Reviewers

Uh oh!

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

claude Bot commented Jul 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel Bot commented Jul 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading