Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport 1.5.0: physical/spanner: use separate client for updating locks (#9423) #9440

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2020

Conversation

calvn
Copy link
Contributor

@calvn calvn commented Jul 9, 2020

  • physical/spanner: use separate client for updating locks

We believe this mitigates an issue where a large influx of requests
cause the leader to be unable to update the lock table (since it cannot
grab a client from the pool or the client has no more open connections),
which causes cascading failure.

* physical/spanner: use separate client for updating locks

We believe this mitigates an issue where a large influx of requests
cause the leader to be unable to update the lock table (since it cannot
grab a client from the pool or the client has no more open connections),
which causes cascading failure.
@calvn calvn added this to the 1.5 milestone Jul 9, 2020
@calvn calvn requested a review from a team July 9, 2020 20:59
@calvn calvn merged commit cd69a30 into release/1.5.x Jul 9, 2020
@calvn calvn deleted the backport-pr-9423-1.5.x branch July 9, 2020 21:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants