Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

provider/openstack: Add State Change support to LBaaS Resources #3926

Merged

Conversation

jtopjian
Copy link
Contributor

This commit adds State Change support to the LBaaS resources which should
help with clean terminations.

It also adds an acceptance tests that builds out a 2-node load balance
service.

@jtopjian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@phinze per my comment in #3547, when you have a moment, let me know if you have an opinion or thoughts on which approach is preferable.

@jtopjian jtopjian force-pushed the jtopjian-openstack-lbaas-statechange branch from 3b29879 to 0edb8bc Compare November 18, 2015 03:38
@jtopjian
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test failure looks unrelated. I'll try again later.

This commit adds State Change support to the LBaaS resources which should
help with clean terminations.

It also adds an acceptance tests that builds out a 2-node load balance
service.
@jtopjian jtopjian force-pushed the jtopjian-openstack-lbaas-statechange branch from 0edb8bc to f9dd42d Compare November 19, 2015 04:34
@phinze
Copy link
Contributor

phinze commented Dec 3, 2015

Nice code, solid test! LGTM

@jtopjian
Copy link
Contributor Author

jtopjian commented Dec 3, 2015

Thanks! I'll go ahead and merge this in. If I get a chance, I'll play around with resource.Retry and compare the two. For now, this should resolve any timing issues currently seen.

jtopjian added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2015
…change

provider/openstack: Add State Change support to LBaaS Resources
@jtopjian jtopjian merged commit 387a8ea into hashicorp:master Dec 3, 2015
@jtopjian jtopjian deleted the jtopjian-openstack-lbaas-statechange branch March 23, 2017 16:07
omeid pushed a commit to omeid/terraform that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2018
…scaling_group-sweep-more

tests/resource/aws_autoscaling_group: Sweep additional groups
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 15, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 15, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants