-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 10.1k
Swap to using google.golang.org/protobuf/cmd/protoc-gen-go instead of github.com/golang/protobuf/protoc-gen-go
#37685
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a2d8a9c
Reformat Args in steps definitions
SarahFrench 73c0288
Swap to using the new version of protoc-gen-go that doesn't include g…
SarahFrench c35430b
Run `make protobuf` with problem generate steps commented out.
SarahFrench 89fccc4
Use `require_unimplemented_servers=false` to minimise changes at the …
SarahFrench 6b3cbf5
WIP
SarahFrench fdb25ca
Fix out/opt typo, add remaining flags once terraform1.proto was being…
SarahFrench beeba72
Run `make protobuf`
SarahFrench c6fa695
`go get google.golang.org/grpc/cmd/[email protected]` && `go …
SarahFrench 38e43cd
Run `make protobuf` with new version of protoc-gen-go-grpc that allow…
SarahFrench 7cadb28
Potential fix for `internal/rpcapi/dynrpcserver/generator`
SarahFrench File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
139 changes: 139 additions & 0 deletions
139
internal/cloudplugin/cloudproto1/cloudproto1_grpc.pb.go
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change is related to this issue I highlighted in an earlier comment. This script is written expecting .pb.go files generated from the old
github.com/golang/protobuf/protoc-gen-gotooling. With the new tooling in this PR there are some new interfaces that this script needs to be updated to tolerate.I took inspiration from L83-L85, but I need review from someone more familiar with the purpose of this script (paging @liamcervante).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This makes sense to me, and given it produces no changes in the relevant generated code that seems safe 👍