Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove tags validate in preConfig of TestAccAzureRMKeyVault_update #1534

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 11, 2018
Merged

Remove tags validate in preConfig of TestAccAzureRMKeyVault_update #1534

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 11, 2018

Conversation

lrxtom2
Copy link
Contributor

@lrxtom2 lrxtom2 commented Jul 11, 2018

There are no tags block in preConfig method, so we should remove validate tags in the fitst step of this test: TestAccAzureRMKeyVault_update

Copy link
Contributor

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hi @lrxtom2

Thanks for this PR. Taking a look at this I think it'd be better to update this assertion to check that there's no tags in the Pre phrase, rather than removing it (which doesn't allow us to assert that this has changed)

Thanks!

@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ func TestAccAzureRMKeyVault_update(t *testing.T) {
testCheckAzureRMKeyVaultExists(resourceName),
resource.TestCheckResourceAttr(resourceName, "access_policy.0.key_permissions.0", "create"),
resource.TestCheckResourceAttr(resourceName, "access_policy.0.secret_permissions.0", "set"),
resource.TestCheckResourceAttr(resourceName, "tags.environment", "Production"),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we add this back in but instead check that tags.% is equal to 0 which will ensure there's no tags in the Pre phase

@lrxtom2
Copy link
Contributor Author

lrxtom2 commented Jul 11, 2018

Thanks for @tombuildsstuff
it's a good idea. i would like to follow if meet the same issue.

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff merged commit 4c760cb into hashicorp:master Jul 11, 2018
torresdal added a commit to torresdal/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2018
* api-management:
  Updating to include hashicorp#1565
  resource/servicebus_subscription_rule: Fix the correlation_filter optional values (hashicorp#1565)
  Updating to include hashicorp#1563
  resouce/app_insights: Allow different application_type deployments (hashicorp#1563)
  VMSS: changed sku property from a set to list
  Update CHANGELOG.md to include hashicorp#1552
  Renamed azurerm_azuread_application.html.markdown to azuread_application.html.markdown
  New Data Source: `azurerm_azuread_application`
  VMSS: Updating the code samples to be valid. Fixes hashicorp#1539 (hashicorp#1549)
  Creation Data -> Creation Date (hashicorp#1548)
  Updating to include hashicorp#1546
  Workaround upstream issue in creating azureEndpoints in traffic manager (hashicorp#1546)
  Cleanup after v1.9.0 release
  v1.9.0
  Updating to include hashicorp#1269
  New Resource: `azurerm_azuread_application` (hashicorp#1269)
  Remove tags validate in preConfig of TestAccAzureRMKeyVault_update (hashicorp#1534)
  Updating to include hashicorp#1535
  `azurerm_key_vault_key` - handling the parent Key Vault being deleted (hashicorp#1535)
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 30, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 30, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants