New resource/ data source azurerm_postgresql_flexible_server

[yupwei68]

Fix: #8654
#10455

=== RUN TestAccDataSourcePostgresqlflexibleServer_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccDataSourcePostgresqlflexibleServer_basic
=== CONT TestAccDataSourcePostgresqlflexibleServer_basic
--- PASS: TestAccDataSourcePostgresqlflexibleServer_basic (485.30s)

=== RUN TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_basic
=== CONT TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_basic
--- PASS: TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_basic (744.14s)
=== RUN TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_requiresImport
=== PAUSE TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_requiresImport
=== CONT TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_requiresImport
--- PASS: TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_requiresImport (800.16s)
=== RUN TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_complete
=== PAUSE TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_complete
=== CONT TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_complete
--- PASS: TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_complete (1620.08s)
=== RUN TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_completeUpdate
=== PAUSE TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_completeUpdate
=== CONT TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_completeUpdate
--- PASS: TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_completeUpdate (3408.08s)
=== RUN TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_updateMaintenanceWindow
=== PAUSE TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_updateMaintenanceWindow
=== CONT TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_updateMaintenanceWindow
--- PASS: TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_updateMaintenanceWindow (1124.51s)
=== RUN TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_updateSku
=== PAUSE TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_updateSku
=== CONT TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_updateSku
--- PASS: TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_updateSku (1472.27s)
=== RUN TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_pitr
=== PAUSE TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_pitr
=== CONT TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_pitr
--- PASS: TestAccPostgresqlflexibleServer_pitr (2484.59s)

[yupwei68]

Thanks for your comments, kt. All tests have passed. Please continue reviewing when the linter is fixed.

[katbyte]

I think there is a shared schema function you can use here?

[yupwei68]

The shared schema is a list of string, while here it's a string, shall we change its type to use the shared schema?

[katbyte]

AH good point! we only have a couple zone - this is good

[katbyte]

Thanks @yupwei68 - LGTM 👍

[ghost]

This has been released in version 2.57.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.57.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.