Add enabled attribute for aws_autoscaling_policy

[teraken0509]

Community Note

• Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original pull request comment to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for pull request followers and do not help prioritize the request

Closes #12624

Release note for CHANGELOG:

add `enabled` attribute for aws_autoscaling_policy resource

Output from acceptance testing:

$ make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSAutoscalingPolicy_basic'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./... -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run=TestAccAWSAutoscalingPolicy_basic -timeout 120m
?   	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws	[no test files]
=== RUN   TestAccAWSAutoscalingPolicy_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSAutoscalingPolicy_basic
=== CONT  TestAccAWSAutoscalingPolicy_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAutoscalingPolicy_basic (125.83s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws	127.125s
testing: warning: no tests to run
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws/internal/flatmap	0.497s [no tests to run]
testing: warning: no tests to run
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws/internal/keyvaluetags	0.403s [no tests to run]
testing: warning: no tests to run
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws/internal/naming	0.410s [no tests to run]
testing: warning: no tests to run
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws/internal/service/batch/equivalency	0.508s [no tests to run]
testing: warning: no tests to run
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws/internal/service/eks/token	0.405s [no tests to run]
?   	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/awsproviderlint	[no test files]
testing: warning: no tests to run
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/awsproviderlint/passes	0.726s [no tests to run]
testing: warning: no tests to run
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/awsproviderlint/passes/AWSAT001	0.414s [no tests to run]
testing: warning: no tests to run
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/awsproviderlint/passes/AWSR001	0.302s [no tests to run]
testing: warning: no tests to run
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/awsproviderlint/passes/fmtsprintfcallexpr	0.544s [no tests to run]

[zhelding]

Pull request #21306 has significantly refactored the AWS Provider codebase. As a result, most PRs opened prior to the refactor now have merge conflicts that must be resolved before proceeding.

Specifically, PR #21306 relocated the code for all AWS resources and data sources from a single aws directory to a large number of separate directories in internal/service, each corresponding to a particular AWS service. This separation of code has also allowed for us to simplify the names of underlying functions -- while still avoiding namespace collisions.

We recognize that many pull requests have been open for some time without yet being addressed by our maintainers. Therefore, we want to make it clear that resolving these conflicts in no way affects the prioritization of a particular pull request. Once a pull request has been prioritized for review, the necessary changes will be made by a maintainer -- either directly or in collaboration with the pull request author.

For a more complete description of this refactor, including examples of how old filepaths and function names correspond to their new counterparts: please refer to issue #20000.

For a quick guide on how to amend your pull request to resolve the merge conflicts resulting from this refactor and bring it in line with our new code patterns: please refer to our Service Package Refactor Pull Request Guide.

[ewbankkit]

LGTM 🚀.

% make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_' PKG=autoscaling ACCTEST_PARALLELISM=2 
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/autoscaling/... -v -count 1 -parallel 2  -run=TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_ -timeout 180m
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_basic
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_disappears
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingPredefined
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingPredefined
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingCustom
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingCustom
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingRemoved
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingRemoved
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingUpdated
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingUpdated
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_simpleScalingStepAdjustment
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_simpleScalingStepAdjustment
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_TargetTrack_predefined
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_TargetTrack_predefined
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_TargetTrack_custom
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_TargetTrack_custom
=== RUN   TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_zeroValue
=== PAUSE TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_zeroValue
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_basic
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_zeroValue
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_zeroValue (54.00s)
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingUpdated
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_basic (108.44s)
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_TargetTrack_custom
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingUpdated (95.91s)
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_TargetTrack_predefined
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_TargetTrack_custom (52.81s)
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_simpleScalingStepAdjustment
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_simpleScalingStepAdjustment (49.88s)
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingCustom
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_TargetTrack_predefined (64.36s)
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingRemoved
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingCustom (57.42s)
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_disappears (51.46s)
=== CONT  TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingPredefined
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingRemoved (112.49s)
--- PASS: TestAccAutoScalingPolicy_predictiveScalingPredefined (63.79s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/autoscaling	387.593s

[ewbankkit]

@teraken0509 Thanks for the contribution 🎉 👏.

[FlorinAndrei]

Which release version will get this feature?

@ewbankkit

[ewbankkit]

This week's v4.15.0 release will include the changes.

[github-actions]

This functionality has been released in v4.15.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.