-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bug]: When expanding the plan for aws_ecs_service.qa-ecs-service [...] provider aws produced an invalid new value for .triggers["redeployment"]: was cty.StringVal("2022-11-28T16:50:44Z"), but now │ cty.StringVal("2022-11-28T18:08:03Z"). #28070
Comments
Community NoteVoting for Prioritization
Volunteering to Work on This Issue
|
same issue |
Same issue as well using Terraform v1.3.6 with hashicorp/aws v4.50.0
|
Any updates on this yet? It's proving to be a pretty big blocker for some of my deployment efforts. |
Would it reduce the likelihood of hitting this bug if I used something like date() instead of time()? Something that doesn't change with the time as quickly? |
Did you try using |
This is likely a duplicate of #19583. |
I assume you mean |
@nathanhruby, setting |
It's works fine for me. triggers = {
redeployment = plantimestamp()
} |
@Surgo did you also set the |
…251) REF: hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#28070 Co-authored-by: RoseSecurity <[email protected]>
Terraform Core Version
v1.3.5
AWS Provider Version
v4.41.0
Affected Resource(s)
Expected Behavior
Running apply multiple times with an aws_ecs_service that has
force_new_deployment
set totrue
should run a new deployment of the given ecs Service.Actual Behavior
It shows an error and doesn't run apply (or when it applies, it doesn't do anything, because it says "No Changes").
Relevant Error/Panic Output Snippet
Terraform Configuration Files
Steps to Reproduce
terraform apply
terraform apply
Debug Output
No response
Panic Output
No response
Important Factoids
No response
References
No response
Would you like to implement a fix?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: