Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove inspect-module command #1642

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 22, 2024
Merged

Remove inspect-module command #1642

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 22, 2024

Conversation

dbanck
Copy link
Member

@dbanck dbanck commented Feb 21, 2024

The inspect-module command was introduced ~4 years ago to help debug debugging root module issues (#231). A lot has changed since then, and it's now a burden to keep it up to date with each major change, e.g. index & walker decoupling, introduction of memdb for queued paths, and now the refactoring for stacks support.

This PR removes the old & unused command.

@dbanck dbanck self-assigned this Feb 21, 2024
@dbanck dbanck requested a review from a team as a code owner February 21, 2024 11:36
Copy link
Member

@ansgarm ansgarm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dbanck dbanck merged commit 9764b1e into main Feb 22, 2024
21 checks passed
@dbanck dbanck deleted the c-remove-inspect-module branch February 22, 2024 13:08
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 24, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants