Skip to content

[NET-5346] Expose JWKCluster fields in jwt-provider config entry#2881

Merged
roncodingenthusiast merged 1 commit intomainfrom
NET-5346
Sep 14, 2023
Merged

[NET-5346] Expose JWKCluster fields in jwt-provider config entry#2881
roncodingenthusiast merged 1 commit intomainfrom
NET-5346

Conversation

@roncodingenthusiast
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@roncodingenthusiast roncodingenthusiast commented Aug 31, 2023

Changes proposed in this PR:

How I've tested this PR:

  • Manually
  • Unit tests

How I expect reviewers to test this PR:

TODO:

  • Tests added
  • changelog entry

@roncodingenthusiast roncodingenthusiast added the backport/1.2.x This release branch is no longer active. label Aug 31, 2023
@roncodingenthusiast roncodingenthusiast changed the title WIP - [NET-5346] Expose JWKCluster fields in jwt-provider config entry [NET-5346] Expose JWKCluster fields in jwt-provider config entry Aug 31, 2023
@roncodingenthusiast roncodingenthusiast requested review from a team, kisunji and skpratt and removed request for a team August 31, 2023 16:16
@roncodingenthusiast roncodingenthusiast changed the title [NET-5346] Expose JWKCluster fields in jwt-provider config entry WIP [NET-5346] Expose JWKCluster fields in jwt-provider config entry Aug 31, 2023
@david-yu david-yu linked an issue Aug 31, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@roncodingenthusiast roncodingenthusiast marked this pull request as ready for review September 1, 2023 02:51
@roncodingenthusiast roncodingenthusiast changed the title WIP [NET-5346] Expose JWKCluster fields in jwt-provider config entry [NET-5346] Expose JWKCluster fields in jwt-provider config entry Sep 1, 2023
@roncodingenthusiast roncodingenthusiast force-pushed the NET-5346 branch 2 times, most recently from ae7f87d to e2e7ddc Compare September 5, 2023 19:33
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kisunji kisunji left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one recurring comment about json tags but the rest look good.
I think you may be missing an update to the deepcopy function (I had one in my PR but forgot what generated it 🤔 )

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wilkermichael wilkermichael left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work here! Some really minor comments

Thanks for testing this locally as well :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport/1.2.x This release branch is no longer active.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

JWKSCluster missing from CRD handling

3 participants