Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvement: ServerTimeMark #2823

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 8, 2024

Conversation

ItsEmpa
Copy link
Contributor

@ItsEmpa ItsEmpa commented Oct 26, 2024

What

This PR adds a "ServerTimeMark" class similar to the SimpleTimeMark one, except instead of measuring real time it tries to do a rough estimation accounting for server lag. It also adds a ServerTickEvent (also just a rough estimation), and uses the ServerTimeMark class for golden fish timer.

Changelog Improvements

  • Improved the Golden Fish Timer to account for server lag. - Empa

Changelog Technical Details

  • Added the ServerTimeMark class and ServerTickEvent. - Empa

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Backend A backend pull request that will be merged soon label Oct 26, 2024
@hannibal002 hannibal002 added this to the Version 0.28 milestone Oct 26, 2024
@hannibal002 hannibal002 changed the title Backend: ServerTimeMark Improvement + Backend: ServerTimeMark Nov 24, 2024
@hannibal002 hannibal002 removed the Backend A backend pull request that will be merged soon label Nov 24, 2024
@hannibal002 hannibal002 added the Soon This Pull Request will be merged within the next couple of betas label Dec 5, 2024
@hannibal002 hannibal002 enabled auto-merge (squash) December 8, 2024 18:44
@hannibal002 hannibal002 merged commit 9fb3897 into hannibal002:beta Dec 8, 2024
6 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Soon This Pull Request will be merged within the next couple of betas label Dec 8, 2024
@hannibal002 hannibal002 changed the title Improvement + Backend: ServerTimeMark Improvement: ServerTimeMark Dec 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants