Skip to content

[ARCHIVED] Benchmark issue 485 - #485

Closed
guyoron1 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
lsp-test/484-agents-md-backlink-guidance
Closed

[ARCHIVED] Benchmark issue 485#485
guyoron1 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
lsp-test/484-agents-md-backlink-guidance

Conversation

@guyoron1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Closes #484

LSP experiment v2: clean first-review with gopls-lsp enabled.
Code identical to PR #413 (issue #373).
Branch created from commit ad9d6bd.

Extend the problem-doc section of AGENTS.md to require authors
to search existing docs for references to their topic and add
reciprocal backlinks in the same PR. This codifies the practice
demonstrated in PR fullsend-ai#3064, where the maintainer had to manually
add backlinks from three existing docs to a new doc.

Closes #373
Update the "Where does my contribution go?" table to mention adding
backlinks from existing docs, matching the guidance added to AGENTS.md.

Addresses review feedback on #413
@guyoron1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

/fs-review

@fullsend-ai-review

fullsend-ai-review Bot commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 10:22 AM UTC · Completed 10:27 AM UTC
Commit: 758c511 · View workflow run →

@fullsend-ai-review

fullsend-ai-review Bot commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review

Findings

Medium


Labels: PR title tags indicate LSP experiment and RTK+Ponytail methodology context.

Previous run

Review — approve

Scope: AGENTS.md (+1 bullet), README.md (+1 table cell edit) — documentation-only, 2 additions / 1 deletion.

Summary

Clean, well-scoped documentation change that codifies the backlink expectation for new problem docs. The new AGENTS.md bullet matches the phrasing proposed in issue #484 almost verbatim, and the README.md table cell mirrors the same guidance at the contribution entry point.

Dimensions evaluated

Dimension Result
Correctness ✅ No issues — guidance is internally consistent and aligns with surrounding bullets
Security ✅ No issues — docs-only diff, no secrets, no injection patterns
Intent & coherence ✅ Matches issue #484 scope exactly, no scope creep
Style & conventions ✅ Follows existing grammatical and formatting patterns
Docs currency ✅ No stale references introduced; no other files need updating
Cross-repo contracts ⏭ Skipped — no APIs or schemas modified

No findings at any severity level.


Protected paths detected — this PR modifies files under one or more
protected paths. The review agent cannot approve PRs that touch these paths.
A human reviewer must approve this PR.

Protected files in this PR:

  • AGENTS.md

Labels: PR is a documentation-only change to AGENTS.md and README.md

@fullsend-ai-review fullsend-ai-review Bot added requires-manual-review Review requires human judgment documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Jul 13, 2026
@fullsend-ai-review

fullsend-ai-review Bot commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 10:28 AM UTC · Completed 10:38 AM UTC
Commit: fa6bdf7 · View workflow run →

@fullsend-ai-review fullsend-ai-review Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See the review comment for full details.

Comment thread AGENTS.md
- Problem documents (`docs/problems/`) should present multiple options with trade-offs, not prescribe single solutions.
- Each problem document has an "Open questions" section — this is where unresolved issues live.
- When adding new problem areas, create a new file in `docs/problems/` and link it from `README.md`.
- When a new problem doc covers a topic already mentioned in existing docs, search for references to the concept across `docs/problems/` and add backlinks from those existing docs to the new doc in the same PR. This ensures readers can discover the new doc from its related contexts.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[medium] protected-path

AGENTS.md is a protected governance file. This PR modifies it to add backlink guidance for new problem documents. The PR links to issue #484, which provides clear rationale from a retrospective analysis. Human approval is always required for protected-path changes, regardless of context.

@fullsend-ai-review fullsend-ai-review Bot added requires-manual-review Review requires human judgment LSP Benchmark: LSP enabled for review+fix rtk+ponytail Benchmark: RTK+Ponytail optimizations and removed requires-manual-review Review requires human judgment labels Jul 13, 2026
@guyoron1 guyoron1 closed this Jul 14, 2026
@guyoron1 guyoron1 changed the title [LSP] [RTK+Ponytail] Add AGENTS.md guidance: new problem docs should include backlinks from existing docs that reference the topic [ARCHIVED] Benchmark issue 485 Jul 14, 2026
@github-actions
github-actions Bot deleted the lsp-test/484-agents-md-backlink-guidance branch August 16, 2026 03:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation LSP Benchmark: LSP enabled for review+fix requires-manual-review Review requires human judgment rtk+ponytail Benchmark: RTK+Ponytail optimizations

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ARCHIVED] Benchmark issue 484

1 participant