Skip to content

Two blank lines were orphaning the annotations they belong to #9078

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
gunbai-bot wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Two blank lines were orphaning the annotations they belong to #9078

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions dag/test/manual/command_runner_local_argv_receipt_test.dag
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ import extdeps.shell.exec { ProcessOutputPresent, ProcessOutputAbsent, ProcessRe
// hermetic version of this file could only assert the mock, which is the specification-without-
// execution trap. It therefore runs wet, by hand, and is excluded from the floor exactly as
// test/manual/process_argv_expansion_receipt_test.dag is, for the same reason.

test fn spaced_operand_survives_as_one_argument() -> Bool {
process_outcome_receipt_text(
outcome: run_shell_command_capture(
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -81,7 +80,6 @@ test fn plain_operand_round_trips() -> Bool {
//
// These two go red if ShellCaptureResult is restored, because then both arms are stdout == "" and
// nothing in the value distinguishes them.

test fn nonzero_exit_printing_nothing_is_refused_not_absent() -> Bool {
match run_shell_command_capture(
command: posix_sh_program_command(script: "exit 3"),
Expand Down
Loading